Indexed in Journament

international journal of engineering and technology(uae)

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,176 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
28 Articles
Scores higher than 7.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of engineering and technology(uae)
Abbreviated Name international journal of engineering and technology(uae)
URL https://www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/ijet

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international journal of engineering and technology(uae)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.5
Innovation 31.5 25.7
Community Impact 5.7 5.8
Content Distribution 57.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2016
a video-based approach to calibrating car-following parameters in vissim for urban traffic
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
332 views DOI Abstract
2018
Process safety management in manufacturing industries a review
Vol. 7 , pp. 540-543
330 views DOI
2014
communication's role in safety management and performance for the road safety practices
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 79-94
307 views DOI Abstract
2016
using stationary image based data collection method for evaluation of traffic sign condition
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 248-256
278 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluating life cycle costs of perpetual pavements in china using operational pavement management system
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 103-109
271 views DOI Abstract
2018
Dialectics of ENGLISH LINGUISTICS
Vol. 7 , pp. 49-52
254 views DOI
2014
prediction of marshall parameters of modified bituminous mixtures using artificial intelligence techniques
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 211-227
235 views DOI Abstract
2015
automated sequence selection and cost calculation for maintenance and rehabilitation in highway life-cycle cost analysis (lcca)
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 61-75
233 views DOI Abstract
2018
Dialectics of ENGLISH LINGUISTICS
Vol. 7 , pp. 49-52
254 views DOI
2018
A fully security included cloud computing architecture
Vol. 7 , pp. 807-812
166 views
2018
Process safety management in manufacturing industries a review
Vol. 7 , pp. 540-543
330 views DOI
2017
a joint model of mode and shipment size choice using the first generation of commodity flow survey public use microdata
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 330-343
150 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluating life cycle costs of perpetual pavements in china using operational pavement management system
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 103-109
271 views DOI Abstract
2016
analysis of moving bottlenecks considering a triangular fundamental diagram
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 186-199
23 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
24.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,176 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

24.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

31.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

57.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.