Indexed in Journament

BMJ open quality

ISSN 2399-6641· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,834 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
36 Articles
Scores higher than 8.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name BMJ Open Qual
Abbreviated Name bmj open qual
ISSN 2399-6641
URL https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 31.5 31.2
Community Impact 12.9 13.4
Content Distribution 65.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (36)

2019
Quality of care during childbirth at public health facilities in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study using WHO/UNICEF 'Every Mother Every Newborn (EMEN)' standards.
Billah, Sk Masum;Chowdhury, Mohiuddin Ahsanul Kabir;Khan, Abdullah Nurus Salam;Karim, Farhana;Hassan, Aniqa;Zaka, Nabila;Arifeen, Shams El;Manu, Alexander;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000596
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evidence-based practice 'on-the-go': using ViaTherapy as a tool to enhance clinical decision making in upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, a quality improvement initiative.
Hancock, Nicola J;Collins, Kathryn;Dorer, Charlie;Wolf, Steven L;Bayley, Mark;Pomeroy, Valerie M;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000592
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring stakeholder perceptions around implementation of the Operating Room Black Box for patient safety research: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.
Etherington, Nicole;Usama, Aya;Patey, Andrea M;Trudel, Chantal;Przybylak-Brouillard, Antoine;Presseau, Justin;Grimshaw, Jeremy M;Boet, Sylvain;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000686
401 views DOI Abstract
2020
Accuracy of medical billing data against the electronic health record in the measurement of colorectal cancer screening rates.
Rudrapatna, Vivek A;Glicksberg, Benjamin S;Avila, Patrick;Harding-Theobald, Emily;Wang, Connie;Butte, Atul J;
Vol. 9 , No. 1
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
A focused mapping review and synthesis of a priori risk factors associated with medical misconduct.
Croft, Edward;Clark, Maria Tighe;Efstathiou, Nikolaos;Bradbury-Jones, Caroline;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e000538
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quantifying patient satisfaction with process metrics using a weighted bundle approach.
Riebling, Nancy B;Norouzzadeh, Shaghayegh;Reeder, George;Mouradian, Christina;Hillier, Alison;Cowan, Ryan;Doerfler, Martin;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e000458
305 views DOI Abstract
2011
new developments in electrochemical sensors based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-modified electrodes
;Stelian Lupu
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
295 views DOI Abstract
2012
automated online solid-phase extraction coupled with sequential injection-hplc-ec system for the determination of sulfonamides in shrimp
;Pimkwan Chantarateepra;Weena Siangproh;Shoji Motomizu;Orawon Chailapakul
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
286 views DOI Abstract
2011
electrochemical sensor for determination of parathion based on electropolymerization poly(safranine) film electrode
;Xingyuan Liu
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
286 views DOI Abstract
2011
porous materials to support bilayer lipid membranes for ion channel biosensors
;Thai Phung;Yanli Zhang;James Dunlop;Julie E. Dalziel
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
285 views DOI Abstract
2023
Enhancing early functional independence following cardiac surgery: a quality improvement programme.
Jacob, Prasobh;Jayaprabha Surendran, Praveen;Gupta, Poonam;Mahinay, Menandro;Sarmiento, Ansel Lakindanum;Abas, Asma Saif Ebrahim;Mohammed, Shady Ashraf;Sarhan, Hatem Hemdan;Ureta, Julie;Mathew, Gigi;Galvez, Ryan Oliver Antonio;Thangaraj, Parthasarathi;Singh, Rajvir;
Vol. 12 , No. 4
110 views DOI Abstract
2023
Enhancing early functional independence following cardiac surgery: a quality improvement programme
Gupta, Poonam;Singh, Rajvir;Jacob, Prasobh;Mathew, Gigi;Mahinay, Menandro;Surendran, Praveen Jayaprabha;Sarmiento, Ansel Lakindanum;Abas, Asma Saif Ebrahim;Mohammed, Shady Ashraf;Sarhan, Hatem Hemdan;Ureta, Julie;Galvez, Ryan Oliver Antonio;Thangaraj, Parthasarathi;
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. -
84 views Abstract
2021
Multidisciplinary, early mobility approach to enhance functional independence in patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit: a quality improvement programme.
Jacob, Prasobh;Gupta, Poonam;Shiju, Shiny;Omar, Amr Salah;Ansari, Syed;Mathew, Gigi;Varghese, Miki;Pulimoottil, Jinsograce;Varkey, Sumi;Mahinay, Menandro;Jesus, Darlene;Surendran, Praveen;
Vol. 10 , No. 3
132 views DOI Abstract
2021
Multidisciplinary, early mobility approach to enhance functional independence in patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit: a quality improvement programme
Gupta, Poonam;Shiju, Shiny;Jacob, Prasobh;Omar, Amr Salah;Ansari, Syed;Mathew, Gigi;Varghese, Miki;Pulimoottil, Jinsograce;Varkey, Sumi;Mahinay, Menandro;Jesus, Darlene;Surendran, Praveen;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. -
51 views
2020
Accuracy of medical billing data against the electronic health record in the measurement of colorectal cancer screening rates.
Rudrapatna, Vivek A;Glicksberg, Benjamin S;Avila, Patrick;Harding-Theobald, Emily;Wang, Connie;Butte, Atul J;
Vol. 9 , No. 1
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring stakeholder perceptions around implementation of the Operating Room Black Box for patient safety research: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.
Etherington, Nicole;Usama, Aya;Patey, Andrea M;Trudel, Chantal;Przybylak-Brouillard, Antoine;Presseau, Justin;Grimshaw, Jeremy M;Boet, Sylvain;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000686
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evidence-based practice 'on-the-go': using ViaTherapy as a tool to enhance clinical decision making in upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, a quality improvement initiative.
Hancock, Nicola J;Collins, Kathryn;Dorer, Charlie;Wolf, Steven L;Bayley, Mark;Pomeroy, Valerie M;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000592
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality of care during childbirth at public health facilities in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study using WHO/UNICEF 'Every Mother Every Newborn (EMEN)' standards.
Billah, Sk Masum;Chowdhury, Mohiuddin Ahsanul Kabir;Khan, Abdullah Nurus Salam;Karim, Farhana;Hassan, Aniqa;Zaka, Nabila;Arifeen, Shams El;Manu, Alexander;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000596
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quantifying patient satisfaction with process metrics using a weighted bundle approach.
Riebling, Nancy B;Norouzzadeh, Shaghayegh;Reeder, George;Mouradian, Christina;Hillier, Alison;Cowan, Ryan;Doerfler, Martin;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e000458
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
A focused mapping review and synthesis of a priori risk factors associated with medical misconduct.
Croft, Edward;Clark, Maria Tighe;Efstathiou, Nikolaos;Bradbury-Jones, Caroline;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e000538
375 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,834 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

31.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.