BMJ open quality | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1454 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

BMJ open quality

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name BMJ Open Qual
Abbreviated Name bmj open qual
ISSN 2399-6641
Aim and Scope
URL https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (36 total)

2019
Quality of care during childbirth at public health facilities in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study using WHO/UNICEF 'Every Mother Every Newborn (EMEN)' standards.
Billah, Sk Masum;Chowdhury, Mohiuddin Ahsanul Kabir;Khan, Abdullah Nurus Salam;Karim, Farhana;Hassan, Aniqa;Zaka, Nabila;Arifeen, Shams El;Manu, Alexander;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000596
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evidence-based practice 'on-the-go': using ViaTherapy as a tool to enhance clinical decision making in upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, a quality improvement initiative.
Hancock, Nicola J;Collins, Kathryn;Dorer, Charlie;Wolf, Steven L;Bayley, Mark;Pomeroy, Valerie M;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000592
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring stakeholder perceptions around implementation of the Operating Room Black Box for patient safety research: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.
Etherington, Nicole;Usama, Aya;Patey, Andrea M;Trudel, Chantal;Przybylak-Brouillard, Antoine;Presseau, Justin;Grimshaw, Jeremy M;Boet, Sylvain;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e000686
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Accuracy of medical billing data against the electronic health record in the measurement of colorectal cancer screening rates.
Rudrapatna, Vivek A;Glicksberg, Benjamin S;Avila, Patrick;Harding-Theobald, Emily;Wang, Connie;Butte, Atul J;
Vol. 9 , No. 1
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
A focused mapping review and synthesis of a priori risk factors associated with medical misconduct.
Croft, Edward;Clark, Maria Tighe;Efstathiou, Nikolaos;Bradbury-Jones, Caroline;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e000538
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quantifying patient satisfaction with process metrics using a weighted bundle approach.
Riebling, Nancy B;Norouzzadeh, Shaghayegh;Reeder, George;Mouradian, Christina;Hillier, Alison;Cowan, Ryan;Doerfler, Martin;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e000458
269 views DOI Abstract
2012
automated online solid-phase extraction coupled with sequential injection-hplc-ec system for the determination of sulfonamides in shrimp
;Pimkwan Chantarateepra;Weena Siangproh;Shoji Motomizu;Orawon Chailapakul
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
248 views DOI Abstract
2011
porous materials to support bilayer lipid membranes for ion channel biosensors
;Thai Phung;Yanli Zhang;James Dunlop;Julie E. Dalziel
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
247 views DOI Abstract
2011
new developments in electrochemical sensors based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-modified electrodes
;Stelian Lupu
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
244 views DOI Abstract
2011
electrochemical sensor for determination of parathion based on electropolymerization poly(safranine) film electrode
;Xingyuan Liu
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
241 views DOI Abstract
View All 36 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.