Indexed in Journament

sao paulo medical journal = revista paulista de medicina

ISSN 1806-9460· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,972 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 14.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name sao paulo med j
Abbreviated Name sao paulo med j
ISSN 1806-9460
URL http://www.scielo.br/spmj

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 36.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 62.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 36.0 25.7
Community Impact 6.4 5.8
Content Distribution 62.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2019
Health professionals' perception of patient safety culture in a university hospital in São Paulo: A cross-sectional study applying the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.
Okuyama, Julia Hiromi Hori;Galvão, Taís Freire;Crozatti, Marcia Terezinha Lonardoni;Silva, Marcus Tolentino;
629 views DOI Abstract
Academic performance of students who underwent psychiatric treatment at the students' mental health service of a Brazilian university.
Campos, Cláudia Ribeiro Franulovic;Oliveira, Maria Lilian Coelho;Mello, Tânia Maron Vichi Freire de;Dantas, Clarissa de Rosalmeida;
Vol. 135 , No. 1 , pp. 23-28
520 views DOI Abstract
2019
Secondhand smoking, knowledge/attitudes and socioeconomic status among married Bangladeshi women: a cross-sectional study.
Rahman, Mosiur;Hasan, Sheikh Mohammad Mahmudul;Haque, Syed Emdadul;Haque, Nuruzzaman;Rahman, Mosfequr;Mostofa, Golam;Zahan, Sarwar;Huda, Durrul;Sobaihi, Saber Al-;Ahmed, Kapil;Mahmud, Howlader Mohammad Miraz;
Vol. 137 , No. 1 , pp. 13-24
449 views DOI Abstract
2014
turar ryskulov: the career of a kazakh revolutionary leader during the construction of the new soviet state, 1917-1926
;Xavier Hallez
, No. 3 , pp. 119-134
424 views DOI Abstract
2015
"...so i decided to be a pole..."
;Ines Ackermann
, No. 2 , pp. 159-177
358 views DOI Abstract
2017
introduction to the thematic section
;Wojciech Sajkowski
, No. 6 , pp. 5-8
327 views DOI Abstract
2015
neighbourhood as a cultural and social issue
;Maciej Falski
, No. 4 , pp. 5-10
322 views DOI Abstract
2015
narzędzia językowe w sytuacji ekstremalnej. stanisława lema fantastyczne światy ze słów
;Ryszard Handke
, No. 1 , pp. 159-207
312 views DOI Abstract
2017
the influence of the reconquista on muslim law in al-andalus
;Filip Andrzej Jakubowski
, No. 6 , pp. 9-22
297 views DOI Abstract
2015
gane todorovski (1929–2010)
;Valentina Mironska-Hristovska
, No. 1 , pp. 351-352
264 views DOI Abstract
2019
Secondhand smoking, knowledge/attitudes and socioeconomic status among married Bangladeshi women: a cross-sectional study.
Rahman, Mosiur;Hasan, Sheikh Mohammad Mahmudul;Haque, Syed Emdadul;Haque, Nuruzzaman;Rahman, Mosfequr;Mostofa, Golam;Zahan, Sarwar;Huda, Durrul;Sobaihi, Saber Al-;Ahmed, Kapil;Mahmud, Howlader Mohammad Miraz;
Vol. 137 , No. 1 , pp. 13-24
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health professionals' perception of patient safety culture in a university hospital in São Paulo: A cross-sectional study applying the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.
Okuyama, Julia Hiromi Hori;Galvão, Taís Freire;Crozatti, Marcia Terezinha Lonardoni;Silva, Marcus Tolentino;
629 views DOI Abstract
2017
introduction to the thematic section
;Wojciech Sajkowski
, No. 6 , pp. 5-8
327 views DOI Abstract
2017
meyerhold bound: montažstroj's “vatrotehna (2.0)” and the barbaric discipline of the machine
;Leo Rafolt
, No. 6 , pp. 131-152
155 views DOI Abstract
2017
the empire strikes back. russian national cinema after 2005
;Tomasz Rawski;Katarzyna Roman-Rawska
, No. 6 , pp. 97-112
195 views DOI Abstract
2017
the influence of the reconquista on muslim law in al-andalus
;Filip Andrzej Jakubowski
, No. 6 , pp. 9-22
297 views DOI Abstract
2016
the third edition of the inka brodzka-wald award
;Jolanta Sujecka
, No. 5 , pp. 214-215
153 views DOI Abstract
2015
hungarians and jews. an important monograph with deficit
;Magdolna Balogh
, No. 2 , pp. 297-303
167 views DOI Abstract
2015
the ​fest-noz: a way to live breton culture
;Nicole Dołowy-Rybińska
, No. 2 , pp. 233-254
225 views DOI Abstract
2015
narzędzia językowe w sytuacji ekstremalnej. stanisława lema fantastyczne światy ze słów
;Ryszard Handke
, No. 1 , pp. 159-207
312 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,972 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

36.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.