Indexed in Journament

annals of gastroenterological surgery

ISSN 2475-0328· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.9/100
Journament Score
#11,150
Journament Rank
21
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ann gastroenterol surg
Abbreviated Name ann gastroenterol surg
ISSN 2475-0328
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/24750328

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2019
Surgical quality improvement programs in Japan and USA: Report from the collaborative projects between Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 343-351
375 views DOI Abstract
2012
upaya pengentasan kemiskinan pada petani menggunakan model tindakan kolektif kelembagaan pertanian
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 96-112
247 views Abstract
2012
ketimpangan gender dalam pertumbuhan ekonomi
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 194-206
241 views Abstract
2008
foreign direct investment (fdi), kebijakan industri, dan masalah pengangguran: studi empirik di indonesia
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 107-119
229 views Abstract
2014
papaya development model as a competitive local superior commodity
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 128-140
205 views Abstract
2012
determinan faktor sosial dan ekonomi terhadap kemiskinan penduduk
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 62-78
195 views Abstract
2014
determinant of poverty level in west kutai regency, indonesia
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 55-67
194 views Abstract
2011
model pemberdayaan masyarakat
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 15-27
173 views Abstract
2015
flypaper effect theory dalam implementasi kebijakan desentralisasi fiskal
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 69-92
153 views Abstract
2015
adopsi inovasi usaha kecil dan menengah (ukm) di surakarta terhadap sistem perbankan syariah
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 93-106
147 views Abstract
2019
Surgical quality improvement programs in Japan and USA: Report from the collaborative projects between Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 343-351
375 views DOI Abstract
2016
competitive advantage analysis of soybean farming in indonesia
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 143-151
77 views Abstract
2015
pemilihan program pengentasan kemiskinan melalui pengembangan model pemberdayaan masyarakat dengan pendekatan sistem
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 135-147
70 views Abstract
2015
flypaper effect theory dalam implementasi kebijakan desentralisasi fiskal
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 69-92
153 views Abstract
2015
distorsi kapasitas perdagangan inter-regional imt-gt kasus provinsi terpilih di sumatera indonesia
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 44-57
11 views Abstract
2015
adopsi inovasi usaha kecil dan menengah (ukm) di surakarta terhadap sistem perbankan syariah
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 93-106
147 views Abstract
2014
papaya development model as a competitive local superior commodity
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 128-140
205 views Abstract
2014
determinant of poverty level in west kutai regency, indonesia
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 55-67
194 views Abstract
2013
determinan produktivitas lahan pertanian subsektor tanaman pangan di indonesia
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 110-125
13 views Abstract
36
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.