american journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the american association of orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the american board of orthodontics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3129 / 33,986
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

american journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the american association of orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the american board of orthodontics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name am j orthod dentofacial orthop
Abbreviated Name am j orthod dentofacial orthop
ISSN 1097-6752
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623219/description#description
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2019
3D stereophotogrammetry versus traditional craniofacial anthropometry: Comparing measurements from the 3D facial norms database to Farkas's North American norms.
Weinberg, Seth M;
Vol. 155 , No. 5 , pp. 693-701
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cone-beam computed tomography airway measurements: Can we trust them?
Obelenis Ryan, Daniel Patrick;Bianchi, Jonas;Ignácio, Jaqueline;Wolford, Larry Miller;Gonçalves, João Roberto;
Vol. 156 , No. 1 , pp. 53-60
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: A qualitative study.
Jacox, Laura Anne;Mihas, Paul;Cho, Christina;Lin, Feng-Chang;Ko, Ching-Chang;
Vol. 155 , No. 3 , pp. 432-442
286 views DOI Abstract
2016
voting-based classification for e-mail spam detection
;Bashar Awad Al-Shboul;Heba Hakh;Hossam Faris;Ibrahim Aljarah;Hamad Alsawalqah
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 29-42
283 views DOI Abstract
2019
Two distalization methods compared in a novel patient-specific finite element analysis.
Ammoury, Makram J;Mustapha, Samir;Dechow, Paul C;Ghafari, Joseph G;
Vol. 156 , No. 3 , pp. 326-336
253 views DOI Abstract
2016
robust image watermarking based on psychovisual threshold
;Ferda Ernawan
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 228-242
237 views DOI Abstract
2014
cover jictra vol. 7 no. 1, 2013
;Journal of ICT Research and Applications
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
230 views
2016
back matter
;Journal of ICT Research and Applications
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. -
224 views
2020
Alteration of tooth movement by reveromycin A in osteoprotegerin-deficient mice.
Minamoto, Chisato;Miyazawa, Ken;Tabuchi, Masako;Hirano, Miyuki;Mizuno, Manami;Yoshizako, Mamoru;Torii, Yasuyoshi;Asano, Yuichirou;Sato, Takuma;Kawatani, Makoto;Osada, Hiroyuki;Maeda, Hatsuhiko;Goto, Shigemi;
Vol. 157 , No. 5 , pp. 680-689
218 views DOI Abstract
2014
back matter
;Journal of ICT Research and Applications
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. -
190 views
View All 17 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.