Indexed in Journament

BMC women's health

ISSN 1472-6874· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,368 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
52 Articles
Scores higher than 74.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name BMC Womens Health
Abbreviated Name bmc womens health
ISSN 1472-6874
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/12905

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for BMC women's health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 20.0 12.6
Diversity 38.9 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 6.4 9.7
Content Distribution 70.1 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (52)

2019
HPV genotype prevalence and distribution during 2009-2018 in Xinjiang, China: baseline surveys prior to mass HPV vaccination.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 90
494 views DOI Abstract
2017
"Life at the River is a Living Hell:" a qualitative study of trauma, mental health, substance use and HIV risk behavior among female fish traders from the Kafue Flatlands in Zambia.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 15
483 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices of women aged at least 25 years in Harare, Zimbabwe.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 91
481 views DOI Abstract
2019
No straight lines - young women's perceptions of their mental health and wellbeing during and after pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 152
479 views DOI Abstract
2018
Self-compassion is associated with less stress and depression and greater attention and brain response to affective stimuli in women managers
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
474 views Abstract
2018
Hyaluronan–binding protein 2 (HABP2) gene variation in women with recurrent miscarriage
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
462 views Abstract
2018
Beyond the statistic: exploring the process of early marriage decision-making using qualitative findings from Ethiopia and India.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 144
449 views DOI Abstract
2013
Determinants of sexual health knowledge in adolescent girls in schools of Riyadh-Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional study.
Vol. 13 , pp. 19
440 views DOI Abstract
2018
Spousal discordance on reports of contraceptive communication, contraceptive use, and ideal family size in rural India: a cross-sectional study.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 147
426 views DOI Abstract
2024
Impact of primary care posttraumatic stress disorder (PC-PTSD) on fertility problem of Iranian women with infertility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 261
113 views DOI Abstract
2024
Prenatal opioid use as a predictor of postpartum suicide attempts among reproductive-age women enrolled in Oregon Medicaid
Vol. 24 , No. 1
90 views DOI
2020
has rural migration weakened agricultural cultivation? evidence from the mountains of southwest china
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 63-
180 views DOI Abstract
2020
humic substances improve vegetable seedling quality and post-transplant yield performance under stress conditions
Vol. 10 , No. 254 , pp. 254-
243 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physiotherapists' and midwives' views of increased inter recti abdominis distance and its management in women after childbirth.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 37
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
A combination intervention addressing sexual risk-taking behaviors among vulnerable women in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster randomized clinical trial.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 111
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Choices and services related to contraception in the Gaza strip, Palestine: perceptions of service users and providers.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 165
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
No straight lines - young women's perceptions of their mental health and wellbeing during and after pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 152
479 views DOI Abstract
2019
"The sun keeps rising but darkness surrounds us": a qualitative exploration of the lived experiences of women with obstetric fistula in Ethiopia.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 37
268 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,368 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.