Indexed in Journament

archives of plastic surgery

ISSN 2234-6163· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.0/100
Journament Score
#9,010
Journament Rank
34
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name arch plast surg
Abbreviated Name arch plast surg
ISSN 2234-6163
URL https://web.thieme.com/books-main/plastic-surgery/product/6226

Indexings

ncbi doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

2019
Establishing cleft services in developing countries: Complications of cleft lip and palate surgery in rural areas of Indonesia.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 511-517
521 views DOI Abstract
2019
A simple clinical assessment of breast animation deformity following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 535-543
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Radially patterned polycaprolactone nanofibers as an active wound dressing agent.
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 399-404
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
The use of autologous fat grafts in breast surgery: A literature review.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 498-510
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel photonumeric hand grading scale for hand rejuvenation.
Vol. 46 , No. 4 , pp. 359-364
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 550-557
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inlay graft of acellular dermal matrix to prevent incisional dehiscence after radiotherapy in prosthetic breast reconstruction.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 544-549
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
A 20-year experience of immediate mandibular reconstruction using free fibula osteocutaneous flaps following ameloblastoma resection: Radical resection, outcomes, and recurrence.
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 426-432
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preparation of harvested skin using the Versajet Hydrosurgery System in full-thickness skin grafts.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 603-607
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
The use of autologous fat grafts in breast surgery: A literature review.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 498-510
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Establishing cleft services in developing countries: Complications of cleft lip and palate surgery in rural areas of Indonesia.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 511-517
521 views DOI Abstract
2019
Early outcomes of cleft and palatal width following anterior palate repair (vomerine flap) in infants with wide cleft lip and palate.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 518-524
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Safety and efficacy of transcutaneous bone conduction implant surgery for hearing improvement in microtia patients with bilateral hearing impairment.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 525-534
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
A simple clinical assessment of breast animation deformity following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 535-543
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inlay graft of acellular dermal matrix to prevent incisional dehiscence after radiotherapy in prosthetic breast reconstruction.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 544-549
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 550-557
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Earwax of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective study.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 566-571
233 views DOI Abstract
2019
Free flap thrombosis in patients with hypercoagulability: A systematic review.
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 572-579
264 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.