archives of plastic surgery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6515 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

archives of plastic surgery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name arch plast surg
Abbreviated Name arch plast surg
ISSN 2234-6163
Aim and Scope
URL https://web.thieme.com/books-main/plastic-surgery/product/6226
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

2019
Establishing cleft services in developing countries: Complications of cleft lip and palate surgery in rural areas of Indonesia.
Ruslin, Muhammad;Dom, Lawrence;Tajrin, Andi;Hajrah Yusuf, Andi Sitti;Arif, Syafri Kamsul;Tanra, Andi Husni;Ou, Keng Liang;Forouzanfar, Tymour;Thamrin, Sri Astuti;
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 511-517
510 views DOI Abstract
2019
A simple clinical assessment of breast animation deformity following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Dyrberg, Diana Lydia;Gunnarsson, Gudjon Leifur;Bille, Camilla;Sørensen, Jens Ahm;Thomsen, Jørn Bo;
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 535-543
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Radially patterned polycaprolactone nanofibers as an active wound dressing agent.
Shin, Dongwoo;Kim, Min Sup;Yang, Chae Eun;Lee, Won Jai;Roh, Tai Suk;Baek, Wooyeol;
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 399-404
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
The use of autologous fat grafts in breast surgery: A literature review.
Bayram, Yalcin;Sezgic, Melihcan;Karakol, Percin;Bozkurt, Mehmet;Filinte, Gaye Taylan;
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 498-510
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel photonumeric hand grading scale for hand rejuvenation.
Lee, Jong Hun;Choi, Yean Su;Park, Eun Soo;Kim, Jong Seo;Kang, Moon Seok;Oh, Hwa Young;Yang, So Dam;Jeon, Seon Hui;
Vol. 46 , No. 4 , pp. 359-364
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Yang, Jun Young;Kim, Chan Woo;Lee, Jang Won;Kim, Seung Ki;Lee, Seung Ah;Hwang, Euna;
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 550-557
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Simultaneous two-layer harvesting of scalp split-thickness skin and dermal grafts for acute burns and postburn scar deformities.
Oh, Suk Joon;
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 558-565
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inlay graft of acellular dermal matrix to prevent incisional dehiscence after radiotherapy in prosthetic breast reconstruction.
Kim, Mi Jung;Ahn, Sung Jae;Fan, Kenneth L;Song, Seung Yong;Lew, Dae Hyun;Lee, Dong Won;
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 544-549
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
A 20-year experience of immediate mandibular reconstruction using free fibula osteocutaneous flaps following ameloblastoma resection: Radical resection, outcomes, and recurrence.
Chai, Koh Siang;Omar, Farah Hany;Mat Saad, Arman Zaharil;Wan Sulaiman, Wan Azman;Halim, Ahmad Sukari;
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 426-432
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preparation of harvested skin using the Versajet Hydrosurgery System in full-thickness skin grafts.
Choi, Seo Gil;Shin, Hyun Woo;Yoon, Kun Chul;
Vol. 46 , No. 6 , pp. 603-607
311 views DOI Abstract
View All 34 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.