estudios de asia y África | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3437 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

estudios de asia y África

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name estudios de asia y África
Abbreviated Name estudios de asia y África
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

1992
Thomas T. Allen [Allsen]. Mongol imperialism, the policies of the Grand Wan Möngke in China, Russia, and the Islamic Lands, 1251-1259. Berkeley, Calif. : University of California Press, 1987. 278 p.
Ortiz, Juana Marisela Connelly;
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 197-198
334 views
1971
Devendra Kaushik. Soviet relations with India and Pakistan. Delhi Press : Vikras Publications, 1971. 119 p.
Amuchástegui, Ermelinda Bataffarano;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 220-223
296 views
2015
Fostering Growth through Tourism in Sub-Saharan Africa
Ruiz, Jorge Fernández;
Vol. 50 , No. 1 , pp. 77-115
257 views Abstract
2012
sistem informasi jaringan irigasi (sijari) kabupaten sukoharjo berbasis program arcview gis 3.3.
;Sriyana Sriyana
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 16-26
241 views Abstract
2012
production of industry salt with sedimentation – microfiltration process: optimazation of temperature and concentration by using surface response methodology
;Widayat Widayat
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 11-18
227 views Abstract
2012
analisis kualitas pengamatan data pasut berdasarkan perbandingan komponen pasut dan simpangan baku
;Yudo Prasetyo
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 63-66
226 views Abstract
2012
evaluasi kelayakan pendanaan proyek dengan teknik pemrograman linier
;Windu Partono
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
226 views Abstract
2012
simulasi pengelolaan sampah kota dengan powersim
;Setia Budi Sasongko
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 96-103
220 views Abstract
2012
pengomposan limbah teh hitam dengan penambahan kotoran kambing pada variasi yang berbeda dengan menggunakan starter em4 (efective microorganism-4)
;Syafrudin Syafrudin;Badrus Zaman
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 125-131
213 views Abstract
2013
studi ozonisasi senyawa organik air lindi tempat pemrosesan akhir sarimukti
;Arya Rezagama
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 82-87
204 views Abstract
View All 33 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.