Indexed in Journament

physical review b

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,472 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 54% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé physical review b
Nom Abrégé physical review b

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 72.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for physical review b
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.2
Content Distribution 72.9 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2004
Magnetic anisotropy in single clusters
Vol. 69 , No. 2 , pp. 1-
390 views DOI
1994
High-magnetic-field transport properties ofBi2Sr2CaCu2O8single crystals
Vol. 50 , No. 9 , pp. 6493-6496
373 views DOI
1987
Localized 3pexcitations in 3dtransition-metal-series spectroscopy
Vol. 35 , No. 9 , pp. 4304-4309
344 views DOI Abstract
1992
Composition, structure, and electrical properties ofBi2Sr2Ca1−yYyCu2O8: A single-crystal study
Vol. 45 , No. 22 , pp. 13025-13034
338 views DOI Abstract
1989
Broken symmetry and (1/2 statistics of spinons in (2+1)-dimensional antiferromagnets
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 2262-2267
318 views DOI
2010
Fluxoid quantization in the critical current of a niobium superconducting loop far below the critical temperature
Vol. 81 , No. 10 , pp. 1-
299 views DOI
1989
Systematics of transport critical-current-density hysteresis in polycrystalline Y-Ba-Cu-O
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 2666-
288 views DOI Abstract
1983
Amorphous deuterated-hydrogenated carbon thin-film infrared absorption spectrum
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 413-414
285 views DOI
2006
Optical absorption by atomically doped carbon nanotubes
Vol. 74 , No. 7
284 views DOI
1990
Phase transitions of quasi-two-dimensional antiferroelectric squaric acid (H2C4O4) and (D2C4O4) investigated by the Green’s-function technique
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 2479-2489
279 views DOI Abstract
2021
Topological surface state manipulation of magnetic damping and surface anisotropy in topological insulator/nonmagnet/CoFe heterostructures
Vol. 103 , No. 1 , pp. 014419-
277 views DOI Abstract
2012
Enhanced magnetic moment in ultrathin Fe-doped CoFe2O4films
Vol. 86 , No. 17 , pp. 174404-
197 views DOI Abstract
2010
Topological insulators for high-performance terahertz to infrared applications
Vol. 82 , No. 24 , pp. 245107-
191 views DOI Abstract
2010
Direct mapping of the spin-filtered surface bands of a three-dimensional quantum spin Hall insulator
Vol. 81 , No. 4 , pp. 041309-
197 views DOI Abstract
2010
Fluxoid quantization in the critical current of a niobium superconducting loop far below the critical temperature
Vol. 81 , No. 10 , pp. 100503-
199 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,472 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.