Indexed in Journament

physical review b

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,134 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 82.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name physical review b
Abbreviated Name physical review b

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for physical review b
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 15.0 19.1
Timeliness 50.0 9.2
Diversity 30.0 25.8
Innovation 40.0 27.4
Community Impact 34.5 7.8
Content Distribution 71.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2004
Magnetic anisotropy in single clusters
Vol. 69 , No. 2 , pp. 1-
372 views DOI
1994
High-magnetic-field transport properties ofBi2Sr2CaCu2O8single crystals
Vol. 50 , No. 9 , pp. 6493-6496
359 views DOI
1987
Localized 3pexcitations in 3dtransition-metal-series spectroscopy
Vol. 35 , No. 9 , pp. 4304-4309
327 views DOI Abstract
1992
Composition, structure, and electrical properties ofBi2Sr2Ca1−yYyCu2O8: A single-crystal study
Vol. 45 , No. 22 , pp. 13025-13034
320 views DOI Abstract
1989
Broken symmetry and (1/2 statistics of spinons in (2+1)-dimensional antiferromagnets
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 2262-2267
305 views DOI
2010
Fluxoid quantization in the critical current of a niobium superconducting loop far below the critical temperature
Vol. 81 , No. 10 , pp. 1-
285 views DOI
1983
Amorphous deuterated-hydrogenated carbon thin-film infrared absorption spectrum
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 413-414
273 views DOI
1989
Systematics of transport critical-current-density hysteresis in polycrystalline Y-Ba-Cu-O
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 2666-
272 views DOI Abstract
2006
Optical absorption by atomically doped carbon nanotubes
Vol. 74 , No. 7
270 views DOI
1990
Phase transitions of quasi-two-dimensional antiferroelectric squaric acid (H2C4O4) and (D2C4O4) investigated by the Green’s-function technique
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 2479-2489
268 views DOI Abstract
2021
Topological surface state manipulation of magnetic damping and surface anisotropy in topological insulator/nonmagnet/CoFe heterostructures
Vol. 103 , No. 1 , pp. 014419-
259 views DOI Abstract
2012
Enhanced magnetic moment in ultrathin Fe-doped CoFe2O4films
Vol. 86 , No. 17 , pp. 174404-
185 views DOI Abstract
2010
Topological insulators for high-performance terahertz to infrared applications
Vol. 82 , No. 24 , pp. 245107-
180 views DOI Abstract
2010
Direct mapping of the spin-filtered surface bands of a three-dimensional quantum spin Hall insulator
Vol. 81 , No. 4 , pp. 041309-
188 views DOI Abstract
2010
Fluxoid quantization in the critical current of a niobium superconducting loop far below the critical temperature
Vol. 81 , No. 10 , pp. 100503-
190 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,134 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.