Indexed in Journament

Scientometrics

ISSN 0138-9130· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.1 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,243 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
82 Articles
Scores higher than 95.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Scientometrics
Abbreviated Name scientometrics
ISSN 0138-9130

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 68.7
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 65.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 68.7 26.2
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.7
Content Distribution 65.8 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (82)

2022
Evaluating the online impact of reporting guidelines for randomised trial reports and protocols: a cross-sectional web-based data analysis of CONSORT and SPIRIT initiatives.
Orduña-Malea, Enrique;Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo;Ontalba-Ruipérez, José-Antonio;Catalá-López, Ferrán;
, pp. 1-34
1,205 views DOI Abstract
2016
conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not
;Adele Diamond;Daphne S. Ling
Vol. 18 , pp. 34-48
626 views Abstract
2020
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.
Martín-Martín, Alberto;Thelwall, Mike;Orduna-Malea, Enrique;Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio;
, pp. 1-36
480 views DOI Abstract
2015
preliminary findings demonstrating latent effects of early adolescent marijuana use onset on cortical architecture
;Francesca M. Filbey;Tim McQueeny;Samuel J. DeWitt;Virendra Mishra
Vol. 16 , No. C , pp. 16-22
475 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring the influence of scientific journal ranking on publication performance in the hungarian social sciences: The case of law and economics
Sasvári, P.
Vol. 119 , pp. 595-616
424 views DOI
2019
A scoping review of simulation models of peer review.
Feliciani, Thomas;Luo, Junwen;Ma, Lai;Lucas, Pablo;Squazzoni, Flaminio;Marušić, Ana;Shankar, Kalpana;
Vol. 121 , No. 1 , pp. 555-594
421 views DOI Abstract
2015
the effects of puberty on white matter development in boys
;Lara Menzies;Anne-Lise Goddings;Kirstie J. Whitaker;Sarah-Jayne Blakemore;Russell M. Viner
Vol. 11 , No. C , pp. 116-128
402 views DOI Abstract
2015
regional brain activation supporting cognitive control in the context of reward is associated with treated adolescents’ marijuana problem severity at follow-up: a preliminary study
;Tammy Chung;David J. Paulsen;Charles F. Geier;Beatriz Luna;Duncan B. Clark
Vol. 16 , No. C , pp. 93-100
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
Erratum to: Titles in English-medium Astrophysics research articles (Scientometrics, (2014), 98, (2331-2351), 10.1007/s11192-013-1174-6)
Méndez, D.
Vol. 108 , pp. 1003
386 views DOI
2019
Participation of women in doctorate, research, innovation, and management activities at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid: analysis of the decade 2006–2016
Hernández-Martín, E.
Vol. 120 , pp. 1059-1089
384 views DOI
2022
Evaluating the online impact of reporting guidelines for randomised trial reports and protocols: a cross-sectional web-based data analysis of CONSORT and SPIRIT initiatives.
Orduña-Malea, Enrique;Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo;Ontalba-Ruipérez, José-Antonio;Catalá-López, Ferrán;
, pp. 1-34
1,205 views DOI Abstract
2021
Webometrics: evolution of social media presence of universities
Sarwar, R.
Vol. 126 , pp. 951-967
99 views DOI
2020
Altmetrics of the Open Access Institutional Repositories: a webometrics approach
Aguillo, I.F.
Vol. 123 , pp. 1181-1192
145 views DOI
2020
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.
Martín-Martín, Alberto;Thelwall, Mike;Orduna-Malea, Enrique;Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio;
, pp. 1-36
480 views DOI Abstract
2020
Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis: Scientometric comparisons across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCoV literature.
Haghani, Milad;Bliemer, Michiel C J;
, pp. 1-32
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
Correction to: Usage pattern comparison of the same scholarly articles between Web of Science (WoS) and Springer (Scientometrics, (2018), 115, 1, (519-537), 10.1007/s11192-017-2616-3)
Chen, B.
Vol. 123 , pp. 1173
232 views DOI
2020
Research on political instability, uncertainty and risk during 1953–2019: a scientometric review
Yi, Y.
Vol. 123 , pp. 1051-1076
184 views DOI
2020
Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019)
Bornmann, L.
, pp. 0-0
182 views DOI
2020
Scientometric laws connecting publication counts to national research funding
Shelton, R.D.
Vol. 123 , pp. 181-206
226 views DOI
2020
Scientometric analysis of social science and science disciplines in a developing nation: a case study of Pakistan in the last decade
Missen, M.M.S.
Vol. 123 , pp. 113-142
236 views DOI
Journament Score
42.1/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,243 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

68.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.