journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the american society of nuclear cardiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2318 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the american society of nuclear cardiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j nucl cardiol
Abbreviated Name journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the american society of nuclear cardiology
ISSN 1532-6551
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2020
Adapting to a novel disruptive threat: Nuclear Cardiology Service in the time of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak 2020 (SARS REBOOT).
Loke, Kelvin S H;Tham, Wei Ying;Bharadwaj, Pushan;Keng, Felix Y J;Huang, Zijuan;Idu, Muhammad Bin;Wong, Yen Ming;Tan, Paul Kia Siong;Zaheer, Sumbul;Khor, Yiu Ming;Ng, David Chee Eng;Wong, Wai Yin;Tong, Aaron Kian-Ti;
319 views DOI
2020
PET-derived bone information from 18F-sodium fluoride: A perfect match for whole-body PET/MR attenuation correction?
Lassen, Martin Lyngby;Slomka, Piotr J;
310 views DOI
2019
Diastolic dyssynchrony assessment by gated myocardial perfusion-SPECT in subjects who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Alexanderson-Rosas, Erick;Espinola-Zavaleta, Nilda;Garcia, Ernest V;Peix, Amalia;Massardo, Teresa;Pabon, Luz M;Antonio-Villa, Neftali Eduardo;Carvajal-Juarez, Isabel;Mesquita, Claudio T;Jimenez-Heffernan, Amelia;Patel, Chetan;Karthikeyan, Ganesan;Kumar, Alka;Butt, Sadaf;Kalaivani, Mani;Marin, Victor;Morozova, Olga;Paez, Diana;
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quantitative Tc-DPD SPECT/CT in patients with suspected ATTR cardiac amyloidosis: Feasibility and correlation with visual scores.
Caobelli, Federico;Braun, Martin;Haaf, Philip;Wild, Damian;Zellweger, Michael J;
267 views DOI Abstract
2017
application of concept maps and critical thinking ability to improve writing reports
;Martono Martono;Susanti Susanti;Suprapti Suprapti
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 201-210
231 views DOI Abstract
2019
the effect of teaching methods and learning styles on students’ english achievement (an experimental study at junior high school 1 pasangkayu)
;Syahrul Munir;Emzir Emzir;Aceng Rahmat
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 233-237
224 views DOI Abstract
2016
development of character education based on local wisdom in indegenous people tengahan sedangagung
;Dina Anika Marhayani
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 66-70
212 views Abstract
2019
Cardiovascular disease in the literature: A selection of recent original research papers
Hage, F.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1051-1053
211 views DOI
2016
implementation of text transformation in physics education to reduce students’ misconception
;Soeharto Soeharto
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 56-60
193 views Abstract
2017
front page
;admin admin
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
192 views DOI
View All 14 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.