Indexed in Journament

Health & social care in the community

ISSN 1365-2524· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.5/100
Journament Score
#8,366
Journament Rank
36
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Health Soc Care Community
Abbreviated Name health soc care community
ISSN 1365-2524
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652524

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (36)

2019
End of life care for people with alcohol and drug problems: Findings from a Rapid Evidence Assessment.
Witham, Gary;Galvani, Sarah;Peacock, Marian;
Vol. 27 , No. 5 , pp. e637-e650
574 views DOI Abstract
2008
Gender, ethnicity, culture and social class influences on childhood obesity among Australian schoolchildren: implications for treatment, prevention and community education.
O'Dea, Jennifer A;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 282-90
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
How is the emerging role of domiciliary physiotherapists who treat residents with dementia in nursing homes perceived by allied health professionals? A phenomenological interview study.
McCarroll, Clare;Van't Riet, Catherine;Halter, Mary;
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Responding to the health needs of trafficked people: A qualitative study of professionals in England and Scotland.
Williamson, Victoria;Borschmann, Rohan;Zimmerman, Cathy;Howard, Louise M;Stanley, Nicky;Oram, Sian;
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Home and community care for older people in urban China: Receipt of services and sources of payment.
Hu, Bo;Li, Bingqin;Wang, Jing;Shi, Cheng;
412 views DOI Abstract
2020
Connecting communities: A qualitative investigation of the challenges in delivering a national social prescribing service to reduce loneliness.
Holding, Eleanor;Thompson, Jill;Foster, Alexis;Haywood, Annette;
409 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exposure to and attitudes regarding electronic healthcare (e-Health) among physician assistants in Canada: A national survey study.
Doak, Sara;Schwager, Aimee;Hensel, Jennifer M;
390 views DOI Abstract
2020
"Why do you stay?": The lived-experience of partners of Australian veterans and first responders with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
Waddell, Elaine;Lawn, Sharon;Roberts, Louise;Henderson, Julie;Venning, Anthony;Redpath, Paula;
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
The practitioners' perspective on the upside and downside of applying social capital concept in therapeutic settings.
Sigodo, Kennedy;Davis, Samantha;Morgan, Antony;
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Responding to the health needs of trafficked people: A qualitative study of professionals in England and Scotland.
Williamson, Victoria;Borschmann, Rohan;Zimmerman, Cathy;Howard, Louise M;Stanley, Nicky;Oram, Sian;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 173-181
352 views DOI Abstract
2020
Older lesbian and gay adults' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to accessing health and aged care services in Australia.
Alba, Beatrice;Lyons, Anthony;Waling, Andrea;Minichiello, Victor;Hughes, Mark;Barrett, Catherine;Fredriksen-Goldsen, Karen;Edmonds, Samantha;
279 views DOI Abstract
2020
Consultation with complementary medicine practitioners by individuals with chronic conditions: Characteristics and reasons for consultation in Australian clinical settings.
Foley, Hope;Steel, Amie;Adams, Jon;
253 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring the cost-effectiveness of advance care planning (by taking a family carer perspective): Findings of an economic modelling study
Bauer A;Dixon J;Knapp M;Wittenberg R;;
, pp. -
238 views Abstract
2020
To what extent do community characteristics drive health facility delivery? Findings among Women who had recent live births in Nigeria
Lukman Solanke B;Adebayo Rahman S;Olasupo Ogunjuyigbe P;;
, pp. -
224 views Abstract
2020
"Why do you stay?": The lived-experience of partners of Australian veterans and first responders with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
Waddell, Elaine;Lawn, Sharon;Roberts, Louise;Henderson, Julie;Venning, Anthony;Redpath, Paula;
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
Connecting communities: A qualitative investigation of the challenges in delivering a national social prescribing service to reduce loneliness.
Holding, Eleanor;Thompson, Jill;Foster, Alexis;Haywood, Annette;
409 views DOI Abstract
2020
Responding to the health needs of trafficked people: A qualitative study of professionals in England and Scotland.
Williamson, Victoria;Borschmann, Rohan;Zimmerman, Cathy;Howard, Louise M;Stanley, Nicky;Oram, Sian;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 173-181
352 views DOI Abstract
2020
Complexity in partnerships: A qualitative examination of collaborative depression care in primary care clinics and community-based organisations in California, United States.
Henderson, Stuart;Wagner, Jenny L;Gosdin, Melissa M;Hoeft, Theresa J;Unützer, Jürgen;Rath, Laura;Hinton, Ladson;
318 views DOI Abstract
2020
The practitioners' perspective on the upside and downside of applying social capital concept in therapeutic settings.
Sigodo, Kennedy;Davis, Samantha;Morgan, Antony;
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cost evaluation of an innovative outreach clinic across social insurance codes in rural Northern Germany - A routine data analysis.
Ostermann, Julia K;Erdmann, Daniela;Birker, Thomas;Hejnal, Torsten;Albrecht, Marion;Röwenstrunk, Frank;Schwarz, Julian;Stöckigt, Barbara;Berghöfer, Anne;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 651-661
220 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.