journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1653 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated vor 1 Woche

journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexierungen
ncbi ulakbim
Kurzname j labelled comp radiopharm
Abgekürzter Name j labelled comp radiopharm
ISSN 1099-1344
Ziel und Umfang
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1344
Autorenhinweise

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Targeted alpha therapy with bismuth-213 and actinium-225: Meeting future demand.
Bruchertseifer, F;Kellerbauer, A;Malmbeck, R;Morgenstern, A;
307 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development of an automated, GMP compliant FASTlab radiosynthesis of [ F]GE-179 for the clinical study of activated NMDA receptors.
Khan, Imtiaz;Berg, Tom Christian;Brown, Jane;Bhalla, Rajiv;Wilson, Anthony;Black, Andrew;McRobbie, Graeme;Nairne, James;Olsson, Andreas;Trigg, William;
279 views DOI Abstract
2016
reverse pda – less common type of patent ductus arteriosus -case report
;Iuliu Scurtu;Cosmin Pestean;Radu Lacatus;Meda Lascu;Mircea Mircean;Razvan Codea;Cristian Popovici;Robert Purdoiu;Gabril Giurgiu
Vol. 73 , No. 2 , pp. 351-355
248 views DOI Abstract
2019
"In-loop" carbonylation - a simplified method for carbon-11 labeling of drugs and radioligands.
Ferrat, Mélodie;Dahl, Kenneth;Halldin, Christer;Schou, Magnus;
247 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparative study of the liver anatomy in the rat, rabbit, guinea pig and chinchilla
;Florin Gheorghe STAN
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 33-40
227 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative analysis of electrophoretic profile of major proteins of milk from alpine and carpathian goats
;Alina NASALEAN;Laurentiu OGNEAN;Sergiu MUNTEAN;Stefana BALICI;Horea MATEI
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. 20-25
226 views DOI Abstract
2018
microscopic structure of the epithelium lining the epiglottis in wistar rats
;Vasile RUS;Aura Ștefania PARDI;Bianca MATOSZ;Flavia RUXANDA
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 5-8
222 views DOI Abstract
2016
legs and claws condition and lameness in sows
;Renata Relic;Dragan Rogozarski;Radomir Savic;Mila Savic;Jovan Bojkovski;Zsolt Becskei
Vol. 73 , No. 2 , pp. 277-280
205 views DOI Abstract
2018
advanced techniques of bovine semen analysis
;Mihai CENARIU;Emoke PALL;Mihai BORZAN;Liviu BOGDAN;Ioan GROZA
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
175 views DOI Abstract
2017
testing the altresyn product for oestrus synchronization in gilts
;Liviu BOGDAN;Sanda ANDREI;Adrian MACRI;Ileana BOGDAN;Mihai BORZAN;Sidonia BOGDAN;Anamaria Luciana BLAGA PETREAN
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. 71-74
170 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.