Indexed in Journament

journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals

ISSN 1099-1344· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,140 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 7.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j labelled comp radiopharm
Abbreviated Name j labelled comp radiopharm
ISSN 1099-1344
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1344

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 33.0 27.4
Community Impact 5.7 7.8
Content Distribution 73.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2019
Targeted alpha therapy with bismuth-213 and actinium-225: Meeting future demand.
339 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development of an automated, GMP compliant FASTlab radiosynthesis of [ F]GE-179 for the clinical study of activated NMDA receptors.
335 views DOI Abstract
2016
reverse pda – less common type of patent ductus arteriosus -case report
Vol. 73 , No. 2 , pp. 351-355
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
"In-loop" carbonylation - a simplified method for carbon-11 labeling of drugs and radioligands.
284 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative analysis of electrophoretic profile of major proteins of milk from alpine and carpathian goats
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. 20-25
279 views DOI Abstract
2018
microscopic structure of the epithelium lining the epiglottis in wistar rats
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 5-8
262 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparative study of the liver anatomy in the rat, rabbit, guinea pig and chinchilla
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 33-40
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
legs and claws condition and lameness in sows
Vol. 73 , No. 2 , pp. 277-280
241 views DOI Abstract
2018
advanced techniques of bovine semen analysis
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
228 views DOI Abstract
2017
testing the altresyn product for oestrus synchronization in gilts
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. 71-74
204 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development of an automated, GMP compliant FASTlab radiosynthesis of [ F]GE-179 for the clinical study of activated NMDA receptors.
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
"In-loop" carbonylation - a simplified method for carbon-11 labeling of drugs and radioligands.
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
Targeted alpha therapy with bismuth-213 and actinium-225: Meeting future demand.
339 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparative study of the liver anatomy in the rat, rabbit, guinea pig and chinchilla
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 33-40
261 views DOI Abstract
2018
advanced techniques of bovine semen analysis
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
228 views DOI Abstract
2018
microscopic structure of the epithelium lining the epiglottis in wistar rats
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 5-8
262 views DOI Abstract
2018
intraspecific differences regarding granular polymorphism in granular ducts’ cells in rats’ mandibular gland
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 1-4
68 views DOI Abstract
2017
testing the altresyn product for oestrus synchronization in gilts
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. 71-74
204 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative analysis of electrophoretic profile of major proteins of milk from alpine and carpathian goats
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. 20-25
279 views DOI Abstract
2016
surveillance and management of estrous cycle in awassi and lacaune ewes during out of season
Vol. 73 , No. 2 , pp. 433-436
146 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,140 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

25.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

33.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.