dimensions of critical care nursing : dccn | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2332 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

dimensions of critical care nursing : dccn

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name dimens crit care nurs
Abbreviated Name dimens crit care nurs
ISSN 1538-8646
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.lww.com/dccnjournal/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

The Effectiveness of Workshop and Multimedia Training Methods on the Nurses' Decision-Making Skills Regarding Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation.
Dehghan-Nayeri, Nahid;Vasli, Parvaneh;Seylani, Khatereh;Fallahi, Samira;Rahimaghaee, Flora;Kazemnejad, Anoushirvan;
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 91-100
386 views DOI Abstract
The Impact of HeartMath Resiliency Training on Health Care Providers.
Buchanan, Teresa M;Reilly, Patricia M;
Vol. 38 , No. 6 , pp. 328-336
348 views DOI Abstract
2016
a análise do discurso ideológico do direito e a teoria do agendamento midiático / the analysis of the ideological discourse of law and the agenda-setting theory
;Marco Aurelio Moura dos Santos;Marco Antonio Barbosa
, No. 48 , pp. -
346 views DOI Abstract
Impact of an Educational Program on the Knowledge and Attitude About Pain Assessment and Management Among Critical Care Nurses.
Issa, Marwan Rasmi;Awajeh, Adel M;Khraisat, Firas S;Rasheed, Akram M;Amirah, Mohammad F;Hussain, Ashraf;Alharthy, Abdulrhman;
Vol. 38 , No. 5 , pp. 271-277
343 views DOI Abstract
2017
el caso en méxico de “las patronas” y el premio nacional de derechos humanos 2013 / o caso das “patronas” no méxico e o prêmio nacional de direitos humanos 2013
;Rafael Modesto De Gasperin Gasperin;Enriqueta Guadalupe Del Rio Martínez Guadalupe;María De Gasperin Del Río
, No. 49 , pp. -
301 views DOI Abstract
Moral Distress: Defined and Described by Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Nurses in a Quaternary Care Free-Standing Pediatric Hospital.
Burton, Melissa;Caswell, Hollis;Porter, Courtney;Mott, Sandra;DeGrazia, Michele;
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 101-109
286 views DOI Abstract
Critical Care Registered Nurses' Preparedness in the Provision of End-of-Life Care.
Hall, Meg Ambrose;
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 116-125
279 views DOI Abstract
2016
a recepção dos tratados de direitos humanos pelos tribunais nacionais: sentenças paradigmáticas de colômbia, argentina e brasil / the reception of human rights treaties by domestic courts: paradigmatic judicial decisions from colombia, argentina and brazil
;Antonio Gomes Moreira Maués;Breno Baía Magalhães
, No. 48 , pp. -
265 views DOI Abstract
2017
a contraditória relação entre livre-mercado e desenvolvimento humano: possíveis soluções a partir do conceito de capacidades em amartya sen / the contradictory relationship between free market and human development: possible solutions from the concept of capabilities in amartya sen
;Rafael Veras Castro Melo;Gina Vidal Marcílio Pompeu
, No. 49 , pp. -
253 views DOI Abstract
Viral Myocarditis.
Narovlyanskaya, Oksana;Winokur, Elizabeth J;
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 75-80
205 views DOI Abstract
View All 12 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.