gesundheitswesen (bundesverband der arzte des offentlichen gesundheitsdienstes (germany)) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4014 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
41
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

gesundheitswesen (bundesverband der arzte des offentlichen gesundheitsdienstes (germany))

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name gesundheitswesen
Abbreviated Name gesundheitswesen
ISSN 1439-4421
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.thieme.de/fz/gesu/index.html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2019
[Differences in Self-Reported Working Conditions at Diverse Departments During Introduction of an Occupational Health Management System].
Sammito, Stefan;Schöne, Klaus;Claus, Annika;Rose, Dirk-Matthias;
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Research in Integrated Health Care and Publication Trends from the Perspective of Global Informatics.
Li, Zhong;Zhang, Liang;Pan, Zijin;Zhang, Yan;
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can Routine Data be used to Determine the Target Population of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Early Benefit Assessments in Germany?
Thoren, Corinna Ten;Schwalm, Anja;Mostardt, Sarah;Weber, Dietmar;Ihle, Peter;Altenhofen, Lutz;
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Toilet Hygiene in Schools: an Old and Still Current Topic. Results of a Survey of School Administrators and Students in Frankfurt am Main, 2018].
Heudorf, Ursel;Neuhäusel, Tim;Demircan, Yunus;Leonhardt, Kerstin;Petrozziello, Sofiya;Savas, Gamze;Steul, Kerstin;
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Symptom Burden, Health Services Utilization and Places and Causes of Death in People with Dementia at the End of Life: the Bavarian Dementia Survey (BayDem)].
Kratzer, André;Karrer, Linda;Dietzel, Nikolas;Wolff, Franziska;Hess, Manuela;Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter;Gräßel, Elmar;
295 views DOI Abstract
2016
the continuity and discontinuity of visiting sheikh yusuf tomb tradition in kobbang gowa-south sulawesi
;Syamzan Syukur
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 63-75
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Drawing up a Guideline for Handling Information and Communication Technology, Flexibility and Availability in Small and Medium Enterprises].
Weilnhammer, Veronika;Heinze, Stefanie;Heiden, Barbara;Palm, Esther;Herbig, Britta;Lüke, Gabriele;Nowak, Dennis;Glaser, Jürgen;Herr, Caroline Eva Wella;
Vol. 81 , No. 2 , pp. 113-119
290 views DOI Abstract
2017
Identification of Systemic Contaminations with Legionella Specin Drinking Water Plumbing Systems: Sampling Strategies and Corresponding Parameters
Völker, S.
Vol. 79 , pp. 407-414
279 views DOI
2010
hegemoni elit dalam ritus agama lokal: studi keberagamaan masyarakat bugis bone sulawesi selatan
;Muhammad Rais
, pp. -
273 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Regional Influences on Home Visits - Is Care in Rural Areas Secured in the Long Term?]
Lenz, Fabian;Schübel, Jeannine;Bergmann, Antje;Voigt, Karen;
228 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
41
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

40.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.