journal of agricultural resources and environment | Journament

Journal Ranking

#768 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

journal of agricultural resources and environment

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name journal of agricultural resources and environment
Abbreviated Name journal of agricultural resources and environment
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

2018
traditional uses and pharmacological properties of clerodendrum phytochemicals
;Jin-Hui Wang;Fei Luan;Xiang-Dong He;Yong Wang;Mao-Xing Li
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 24-38
377 views DOI Abstract
2015
Theoretical Framework and Model Design for Beautiful Countryside Construction in China
Xiang-qun, ZHENG;Ming, CHEN;
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 106-115
366 views Abstract
2018
a technology developed from concept of acupuncture and meridian system, the clinical effect of bioceramic resonance on psychological related sleep disturbance with findings on questionnaire, eeg and fmri
;Lei Zhang;Paul Chan;Zhong Min Liu;Yi Li Tseng;C. Will Chen;Ming Tse Lin;Wing P. Chan;Ting-Kai Leung
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 289-295
344 views Abstract
2012
recent progress of research on medicinal mushrooms, foods, and other herbal products used in traditional chinese medicine
;Kuo-Hsiung Lee;Susan L. Morris-Natschke;Xiaoming Yang;Rong Huang;Ting Zhou;Shou-Fang Wu;Qian Shi;Hideji Itokawa
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 1-12
341 views DOI Abstract
2014
antidiabetic activity of polyherbal formulation in streptozotocin – nicotinamide induced diabetic wistar rats
;Rajendran Ramesh Petchi;Chockalingam Vijaya;Subramani Parasuraman
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 108-117
328 views DOI Abstract
2013
anti-inflammatory activity of the invasive neophyte polygonum cuspidatum sieb. and zucc. (polygonaceae) and the chemical comparison of the invasive and native varieties with regard to resveratrol
;Peihong Fan;Tao Zhang, Dr;Kurt Hostettmann
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 182-187
313 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparative evaluation of antimicrobial and antioxidant potential of ethanolic extract and its fractions of bark and leaves of terminalia arjuna from north-western himalayas, india
;Vikas Kumar;Nitin Sharma;Anuradha Sourirajan;Prem Kumar Khosla;Kamal Dev
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 100-106
312 views DOI Abstract
2016
development of an antidiabetic formulation (adj6) and its inhibitory activity against α-amylase and α-glucosidase
;Anand Duraiswamy;Devanand Shanmugasundaram;Changam Sheela Sasikumar;Sanjay M. Cherian;Kotturathu Mammen Cherian
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 204-208
283 views DOI Abstract
2015
some chinese folk prescriptions for wind-cold type common cold
;Zhai Hai-long;Chen Shimin;Lu Yalan
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 135-137
282 views DOI Abstract
2019
Research status and prospects of the resource utilization of organic waste in urban and rural areas
Li, L.
Vol. 36 , pp. 264-271
280 views DOI
View All 37 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.