Indexed in Journament

international journal of industrial engineering and production research

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,279 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
34 Articles
Scores higher than 54.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of industrial engineering and production research
Abbreviated Name international journal of industrial engineering and production research
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 71.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international journal of industrial engineering and production research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.3
Content Distribution 71.8 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

2018
african oral literature and the humanities: challenges and prospects
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 30-
571 views DOI Abstract
2016
Dynamic Inventory Planning with Unknown Costs and Stochastic Demand
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 179-187
481 views Abstract
2018
the challenge of american folklore to the humanities
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 17-
464 views DOI Abstract
2008
Formation Mechanism of Silicon Modified Aluminide Coating on a Ni-Base Superalloy
Vol. 19 , No. 5 , pp. 39-44
411 views Abstract
2015
life sciences—life writing: ptsd as a transdisciplinary entity between biomedical explanation and lived experience
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 4-
409 views DOI Abstract
2014
2016
energy ontologies: wind, biomass, and fossil transportation
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 37-
374 views DOI Abstract
2008
Maximal Independent Sets for the Pixel Expansion of Graph Access Structure
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 13-16
369 views Abstract
2017
genealogies and challenges of transcultural studies
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 4-
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
gleaning and dreaming on car park beach
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 33-
180 views DOI Abstract
2018
african oral literature and the humanities: challenges and prospects
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 30-
571 views DOI Abstract
2018
nuclear avenue: “cyclonic development”, abandonment, and relations in uranium city, canada
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
339 views DOI Abstract
2018
reading derrida in tehran: between an open door and an empty sofreh
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 21-
328 views DOI Abstract
2018
the challenge of american folklore to the humanities
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 17-
464 views DOI Abstract
2017
the function of humanimallegory
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 2-
153 views DOI Abstract
2017
“how to pronounce meme.” three youtube channels
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 10-
263 views DOI Abstract
2017
genealogies and challenges of transcultural studies
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 4-
357 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,279 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.