Indexed in Journament

Фармацевтичний журнал

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5/100
Journament Score
#11,256
Journament Rank
18
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Фармацевтичний журнал
Abbreviated Name Фармацевтичний журнал
ISSN 0000-0000

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2014
a new proposal for learning curve of tep inguinal hernia repair: ability to complete operation endoscopically as a first phase of learning curve
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
416 views DOI Abstract
2018
Synthesis and structural features of 5-(4-(tert-butyl) phenyl)-4-((R)amino)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiols
Vol. 6 , pp. 60-65
400 views Abstract
2019
Study of the state of readiness of pharmaceutical institutions of Ukraine for implementation of integrated quality systems
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 3-12
398 views Abstract
2012
natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery for anterior spinal procedures
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
366 views DOI Abstract
2018
Biological activity of the derivatives of 1,2,4-triazole
Vol. 5 , pp. 25-30
361 views Abstract
2012
minimally invasive thoracic corpectomy: surgical strategies for malignancy, trauma, and complex spinal pathologies
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
336 views DOI Abstract
2014
endovascular recanalization for chronic symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery total occlusion
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
327 views DOI Abstract
2013
single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: short-term outcomes and comparative analysis
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
325 views DOI Abstract
2010
a novel technique of uterine manipulation in laparoscopic pelvic oncosurgical procedures: “the uterine hitch technique”
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Justification of local anesthetic and choice of its concentration in composition of dental gel
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 49-55
242 views Abstract
2019
Study of the state of readiness of pharmaceutical institutions of Ukraine for implementation of integrated quality systems
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 3-12
398 views Abstract
2018
the role of minimally invasive techniques in scoliosis correction surgery
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
219 views DOI Abstract
2018
Synthesis and structural features of 5-(4-(tert-butyl) phenyl)-4-((R)amino)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiols
Vol. 6 , pp. 60-65
400 views Abstract
2018
Biological activity of the derivatives of 1,2,4-triazole
Vol. 5 , pp. 25-30
361 views Abstract
2014
how to evaluate adenomyosis in patients affected by endometriosis?
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
201 views DOI Abstract
2014
endovascular recanalization for chronic symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery total occlusion
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
327 views DOI Abstract
2014
a new proposal for learning curve of tep inguinal hernia repair: ability to complete operation endoscopically as a first phase of learning curve
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
416 views DOI Abstract
2013
neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors and cysts through a working channel with a variable aspiration tissue resector: a feasibility and safety study
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
191 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.