Indexed in Journament

journal of world-systems research

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
23.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,813 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
97 Articles
Scores higher than 5.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of world-systems research
Abbreviated Name journal of world-systems research
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 12.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 58.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of world-systems research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 12.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 58.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (97)

2016
surgical management of intracanal rib head dislocation in neurofibromatosis type 1 dystrophic kyphoscoliosis: report of two cases and literature review
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
383 views DOI Abstract
2015
Creating British Global Leadership: The Liberal Trading Community from 1750 to 1792
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 76-95
381 views Abstract
2017
total knee arthroplasty in severe valgus osteoarthritis excellent early results in a 90-year-old patient with a valgus deformity of 47°
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
372 views DOI Abstract
2014
bilateral, simultaneous medial meniscus bucket handle tears in a 23-year-old female
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
345 views DOI Abstract
2015
Will China’s Development lead to Mexico’s Underdevelopment?
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 106-123
322 views Abstract
2014
use of the composite pedicled pectoralis minor flap after resection of soft tissue sarcoma in reconstruction of the glenohumeral joint
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
304 views DOI Abstract
2020
thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the yellow ligament as a distal adjacent segmental disease after posterior cervical-middle thoracic fusion surgery
Vol. 2020 , pp. -
241 views DOI Abstract
2020
spinal-pelvic dissociation in pregnancy: surgical fixation of culture-negative extrapulmonary tuberculosis
Vol. 2020 , pp. -
192 views DOI Abstract
2018
osteochondroma of the scapula with accessory nerve (xi) compression
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
127 views DOI Abstract
2018
delayed adjacent level spondylodiscitis after initial surgery with instrumented spinal fusion: a report of three cases and review of the literature
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
215 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018
intra-articular entrapment of the medial epicondyle following a traumatic fracture dislocation of the elbow in an adult
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
236 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018
intradural disk herniation mimicking a spinal tumor: radiologic imaging, pathogenesis, and operative management
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
152 views DOI Abstract
2018
the usefulness of dual-layer spectral computed tomography for myelography: a case report and review of the literature
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
145 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
23.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,813 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

23.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

12.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

58.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.