Indexed in Journament

journal of health care chaplaincy

ISSN 1528-6916· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,823 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 25.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j health care chaplain
Abbreviated Name journal of health care chaplaincy
ISSN 1528-6916
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/whcc20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 4.3 11.5
Content Distribution 72.5 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2018
diminished economic return of socioeconomic status at birth among black than white youth
;Shervin Assari
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 74-
509 views DOI Abstract
2018
being different with dignity: buddhist inclusiveness of homosexuality
;Fung Kei Cheng
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 51-
342 views DOI Abstract
2017
sex work and the politics of space: case studies of sex workers in argentina and ecuador
;Jessica Van Meir
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 42-
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
transmedia practices and collaborative strategies in informal learning of adolescents
;Javier Gil Quintana;Sara Osuna-Acedo
Vol. 9 , No. 92 , pp. 92-
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
at the interface of national and transnational: the development of finnish policies against domestic violence in terms of gender equality
;Tuija Virkki
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 31-
317 views DOI Abstract
2015
child welfare in chile: learning from international experiences to improve family interventions
;Carolina Muñoz-Guzmán;Candice Fischer;Enrique Chia;Catherine LaBrenz
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 219-238
313 views DOI Abstract
2015
different welfare system—same values? how social work educators in norway, chile and argentina comprehend core social work and social policy issues
;Rolv Lyngstad
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 239-259
307 views DOI Abstract
2015
airport casualties: non-admission and return risks at times of internalized/externalized border controls
;Maybritt Jill Alpes
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 742-757
300 views DOI Abstract
2018
social exclusion of multicultural families in korea
;Anna Kim
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 63-
299 views DOI Abstract
2016
voluntary turnover: a means of reducing perceived job insecurity? a propensity score matching procedure applied on swiss data
;Florence Lebert
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
298 views DOI Abstract
2020
management students values depending on religion—comparative research from poland
;Barbara Mazur;Łukasz Sułkowski
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 18-
201 views DOI Abstract
2020
transmedia practices and collaborative strategies in informal learning of adolescents
;Javier Gil Quintana;Sara Osuna-Acedo
Vol. 9 , No. 92 , pp. 92-
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Chaplaincy Visits in an Elder Care Setting: A Pilot Analysis of Existing Data.
Zhang, Qian;Shenkel, Jess;Paasche-Orlow, Sara;Cadge, Wendy;Howard, Elizabeth;Bryan, Margaret;Morris, John N;
, pp. 1-14
247 views DOI Abstract
2018
diminished economic return of socioeconomic status at birth among black than white youth
;Shervin Assari
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 74-
509 views DOI Abstract
2018
why people are not willing to let their children ride in driverless school buses: a gender and nationality comparison
;Emily C. Anania;Stephen Rice;Scott R. Winter;Mattie N. Milner;Nathan W. Walters;Matthew Pierce
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 34-
185 views DOI Abstract
2018
pride, paternalism, prejudice—images of the working class
;Ove Skarpenes;Rune Sakslind
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 10-
235 views DOI Abstract
2018
national identity and migration in an emerging gateway community
;Jennifer Byrne
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 73-
108 views DOI Abstract
2018
gender disparities in faculty rank: factors that affect advancement of women scientists at academic medical centers
;Cristina M. López;Cara Margherio;Latecia M. Abraham-Hilaire;Carol Feghali-Bostwick
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 62-
284 views DOI Abstract
2018
suspect outsiders or prospective citizens? constructing the immigrant/german boundary in germany’s integration courses
;Daniel Williams
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 61-
269 views DOI Abstract
2018
being different with dignity: buddhist inclusiveness of homosexuality
;Fung Kei Cheng
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 51-
342 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,823 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.