journal of health care chaplaincy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3250 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

journal of health care chaplaincy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name j health care chaplain
Abbreviated Name journal of health care chaplaincy
ISSN 1528-6916
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/whcc20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (42 total)

2018
diminished economic return of socioeconomic status at birth among black than white youth
;Shervin Assari
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 74-
464 views DOI Abstract
2018
being different with dignity: buddhist inclusiveness of homosexuality
;Fung Kei Cheng
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 51-
285 views DOI Abstract
2017
at the interface of national and transnational: the development of finnish policies against domestic violence in terms of gender equality
;Tuija Virkki
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 31-
280 views DOI Abstract
2017
sex work and the politics of space: case studies of sex workers in argentina and ecuador
;Jessica Van Meir
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 42-
278 views DOI Abstract
2020
transmedia practices and collaborative strategies in informal learning of adolescents
;Javier Gil Quintana;Sara Osuna-Acedo
Vol. 9 , No. 92 , pp. 92-
276 views DOI Abstract
2015
child welfare in chile: learning from international experiences to improve family interventions
;Carolina Muñoz-Guzmán;Candice Fischer;Enrique Chia;Catherine LaBrenz
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 219-238
274 views DOI Abstract
2016
Recovering Religious Voice and Imagination: A Response to Nolan’s Case Study “He Needs to Talk!”
Pesut, B.
Vol. 22 , pp. 28-39
268 views DOI
2016
voluntary turnover: a means of reducing perceived job insecurity? a propensity score matching procedure applied on swiss data
;Florence Lebert
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
264 views DOI Abstract
2015
different welfare system—same values? how social work educators in norway, chile and argentina comprehend core social work and social policy issues
;Rolv Lyngstad
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 239-259
258 views DOI Abstract
2015
airport casualties: non-admission and return risks at times of internalized/externalized border controls
;Maybritt Jill Alpes
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 742-757
256 views DOI Abstract
View All 42 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.