Indexed in Journament

Resuscitation

ISSN 1873-1570· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,885 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
37 Articles
Scores higher than 90.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Resuscitation
Abbreviated Name resuscitation
ISSN 1873-1570
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resuscitation

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 55.6 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.4
Content Distribution 67.3 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2020
Microbiological profile of nosocomial infections following cardiac arrest: insights from the targeted temperature management (TTM) trial.
Harmon, Matthew B A;Hodiamont, C J;Dankiewicz, Josef;Nielsen, Niklas;Schultz, Marcus J;Horn, Janneke;Friberg, Hans;Juffermans, Nicole P;
476 views DOI Abstract
2016
Public awareness and self-efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in communities and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-level analysis.
Ro, Young Sun;Shin, Sang Do;Song, Kyoung Jun;Hong, Sung Ok;Kim, Young Taek;Lee, Dong-Woo;Cho, Sung-Il;
Vol. 102 , pp. 17-24
453 views DOI Abstract
2011
Combining video instruction followed by voice feedback in a self-learning station for acquisition of Basic Life Support skills: a randomised non-inferiority trial.
Mpotos, Nicolas;Lemoyne, Sabine;Calle, Paul A;Deschepper, Ellen;Valcke, Martin;Monsieurs, Koenraad G;
Vol. 82 , No. 7 , pp. 896-901
453 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effectiveness of digital resuscitation training in improving knowledge and skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Lau, Ying;Nyoe, Raphael Song Sue;Wong, Suei Nee;Ab Hamid, Zulkarnain Bin;Leong, Benjamin Sieu-Hon;Lau, Siew Tiang;
Vol. 131 , pp. 14-23
448 views DOI Abstract
2011
Effect of adrenaline on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Jacobs, Ian G;Finn, Judith C;Jelinek, George A;Oxer, Harry F;Thompson, Peter L;
Vol. 82 , No. 9 , pp. 1138-43
447 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of a new respiratory monitoring tool "Early Warning ScoreO" for patients admitted at the emergency department with dyspnea.
Viglino, Damien;L'her, Erwan;Maltais, François;Maignan, Maxime;Lellouche, François;
444 views DOI Abstract
2009
Effects of stomach inflation on haemodynamic and pulmonary function during spontaneous circulation in pigs.
Paal, Peter;Neurauter, Andreas;Loedl, Michael;Brandner, Julia;Herff, Holger;Knotzer, Hans;Mitterlechner, Thomas;von Goedecke, Achim;Bale, Reto;Lindner, Karl H;Wenzel, Volker;
Vol. 80 , No. 4 , pp. 470-7
435 views DOI Abstract
2001
Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Perth, Western Australia, 1996-1999.
Finn, J C;Jacobs, I G;Holman, C D;Oxer, H F;
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 247-55
416 views Abstract
2000
Simply add oxygen: why isn't oxygen administration taught in all resuscitation training?
Oxer, H F;
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 163-9
377 views Abstract
2020
Executive Summary 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.
Nolan, Jerry P;Maconochie, Ian;Soar, Jasmeet;Olasveengen, Theresa M;Greif, Robert;Wyckoff, Myra H;Singletary, Eunice M;Aickin, Richard;Berg, Katherine M;Mancini, Mary E;Bhanji, Farhan;Wyllie, Jonathan;Zideman, David;Neumar, Robert W;Perkins, Gavin D;Castrén, Maaret;Morley, Peter T;Montgomery, William H;Nadkarni, Vinay M;Billi, John E;Merchant, Raina M;de Caen, Allan;Escalante-Kanashiro, Raffo;Kloeck, David;Wang, Tzong-Luen;Hazinski, Mary Fran;
Vol. 156 , pp. A1-A22
371 views DOI
2024
Automatic mobile phone alerting of citizen rescuers using a nationally deployed software can improve neurological outcome and survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Sereno, M.
Vol. 202 , pp. 0-0
75 views DOI
2023
Can ChatGPT pass the life support exams without entering the American heart association course?
Fijačko, N.
Vol. 185 , pp. 0-0
135 views DOI
2021
“I'm sorry, my English not very good”: Tracking differences between Language-Barrier and Non-Language-Barrier emergency ambulance calls for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Perera, N.
Vol. 169 , pp. 105-112
85 views DOI
2020
European Resuscitation Council COVID-19 guidelines executive summary.
Nolan, J P;Monsieurs, K G;Bossaert, L;Böttiger, B W;Greif, R;Lott, C;Madar, J;Olasveengen, T M;Roehr, C C;Semeraro, F;Soar, J;Van de Voorde, P;Zideman, D A;Perkins, G D;, ;
Vol. 153 , pp. 45-55
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Executive Summary 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.
Nolan, Jerry P;Maconochie, Ian;Soar, Jasmeet;Olasveengen, Theresa M;Greif, Robert;Wyckoff, Myra H;Singletary, Eunice M;Aickin, Richard;Berg, Katherine M;Mancini, Mary E;Bhanji, Farhan;Wyllie, Jonathan;Zideman, David;Neumar, Robert W;Perkins, Gavin D;Castrén, Maaret;Morley, Peter T;Montgomery, William H;Nadkarni, Vinay M;Billi, John E;Merchant, Raina M;de Caen, Allan;Escalante-Kanashiro, Raffo;Kloeck, David;Wang, Tzong-Luen;Hazinski, Mary Fran;
Vol. 156 , pp. A1-A22
371 views DOI
2020
Adult Basic Life Support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.
Olasveengen, Theresa M;Mancini, Mary E;Perkins, Gavin D;Avis, Suzanne;Brooks, Steven;Castrén, Maaret;Chung, Sung Phil;Considine, Julie;Couper, Keith;Escalante, Raffo;Hatanaka, Tetsuo;Hung, Kevin K C;Kudenchuk, Peter;Lim, Swee Han;Nishiyama, Chika;Ristagno, Giuseppe;Semeraro, Federico;Smith, Christopher M;Smyth, Michael A;Vaillancourt, Christian;Nolan, Jerry P;Hazinski, Mary Fran;Morley, Peter T;, ;
Vol. 156 , pp. A35-A79
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
risk and financial management of covid-19 in business, economics and finance
;Chia-Lin Chang;Michael McAleer;Wing-Keung Wong
Vol. 13 , No. 102 , pp. 102-
283 views DOI Abstract
2020
Microbiological profile of nosocomial infections following cardiac arrest: insights from the targeted temperature management (TTM) trial.
Harmon, Matthew B A;Hodiamont, C J;Dankiewicz, Josef;Nielsen, Niklas;Schultz, Marcus J;Horn, Janneke;Friberg, Hans;Juffermans, Nicole P;
476 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of a new respiratory monitoring tool "Early Warning ScoreO" for patients admitted at the emergency department with dyspnea.
Viglino, Damien;L'her, Erwan;Maltais, François;Maignan, Maxime;Lellouche, François;
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diagnostic value of lead aVR in electrocardiography for identifying acute coronary lesions in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Yamamoto, M.
Vol. 142 , pp. 97-103
245 views DOI
Journament Score
39.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,885 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.