Indexed in Journament

thinking through fairbairn: exploring the object relations model of mind

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,392 of 23,453 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
61 Articles
Scores higher than 47.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name thinking through fairbairn: exploring the object relations model of mind
Abbreviated Name thinking through fairbairn: exploring the object relations model of mind

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for thinking through fairbairn: exploring the object relations model of mind
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.1 30.0
Accessibility 15.0 19.5
Timeliness 60.0 33.8
Diversity 30.0 30.1
Innovation 40.0 36.0
Community Impact 31.0 22.8
Content Distribution 69.2 86.4
Content Quality 54.2
Ethics & Transparency 39.5
Editorial Standards 32.5
Publication Regularity 51.6
Geographic Reach 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (61)

2013
herbarium of vascular plants collection of the university of extremadura (spain)
Vol. 25 , pp. 1-13
236 views DOI Abstract
2017
integrative research identifies 71 new plant species records in the state of rio grande do norte (brazil) and enhances a small herbarium collection during a funding shortage
Vol. 86 , pp. 43-74
212 views DOI Abstract
2017
argyrella richardsiae, a new species of melastomataceae from the wet miombo woodlands of south-central africa
Vol. 82 , pp. 113-121
198 views DOI Abstract
2015
sirdavidia, an extraordinary new genus of annonaceae from gabon
Vol. 46 , pp. 1-19
192 views DOI Abstract
2018
afropectinariella (vandeae, orchidaceae), a new genus of the angraecum alliance
Vol. 96 , pp. 79-86
185 views DOI Abstract
2017
epitypification with an emended description of tropidia connata (orchidaceae, epidendroideae, tropidieae)
Vol. 80 , pp. 77-85
182 views DOI Abstract
2013
a new species of goniothalamus (annonaceae) from palawan, and a new nomenclatural combination in the genus from fiji
Vol. 32 , pp. 27-35
177 views DOI Abstract
2015
four new species of pyropia (bangiales, rhodophyta) from the west coast of north america: the pyropia lanceolata species complex updated
Vol. 52 , pp. 1-22
175 views DOI Abstract
2020
Consciousness and Experience
5 views DOI Abstract
2018
the taxonomic identity of three varieties of lecanorchis nigricans (vanilleae, vanilloideae, orchidaceae) in japan
Vol. 92 , pp. 17-35
125 views DOI Abstract
2018
afropectinariella (vandeae, orchidaceae), a new genus of the angraecum alliance
Vol. 96 , pp. 79-86
185 views DOI Abstract
2018
taxonomic review of ceratozamia (zamiaceae) in the sierra madre oriental, mexico
Vol. 100 , pp. 91-124
48 views DOI Abstract
2018
two new species of oreocharis (gesneriaceae) from fan si pan, the highest mountain in vietnam
Vol. 94 , pp. 95-106
121 views DOI Abstract
2017
corrigenda: premna bhamoensis (lamiaceae, premnoideae), a new species from kachin state, northeastern myanmar
Vol. 85 , pp. 125-125
135 views DOI Abstract
2017
solanum jobsonii, a novel andromonoecious bush tomato species from a new australian national park
Vol. 82 , pp. 1-13
123 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,392 of 23,453 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.