the british journal of dermatology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1967 / 33,940
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

the british journal of dermatology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name br j dermatol
Abbreviated Name br j dermatol
ISSN 1365-2133
Aim and Scope
URL https://academic.oup.com/bjd
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (76 total)

2008
Efficacy and safety of retapamulin ointment as treatment of impetigo: randomized double-blind multicentre placebo-controlled trial
Koning S;van der Wouden JC;Chosidow O;Twynholm M;Singh KP;Scangarella N;Oranje AP;;
Vol. 158 , No. 5 , pp. -
490 views Abstract
2007
Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus toxins and nasal carriage in furuncles and impetigo
Durupt F;Mayor L;Bes M;Reverdy ME;Vandenesch F;Thomas L;Etienne J;;
Vol. 157 , No. 6 , pp. -
485 views Abstract
2020
A changed life: The life experiences of patients with psoriasis receiving biological treatment.
Trettin, B;Feldman, S;Andersen, F;Danbjørg, D B;Agerskov, H;
419 views DOI Abstract
2006
Oedema as a risk factor for multiple episodes of cellulitis/erysipelas of the lower leg: a series with community follow-up
Cox NH;;
Vol. 155 , No. 5 , pp. -
405 views Abstract
1985
The value of bacteriology and serology in the diagnosis of cellulitis and erysipelas
Leppard BJ;Seal DV;Colman G;Hallas G;;
Vol. 112 , No. 5 , pp. -
380 views Abstract
2019
TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce: protocol for a European safety study of dupilumab and other systemic therapies in patients with atopic eczema.
Bosma, A L;Spuls, P I;Garcia-Doval, I;Naldi, L;Prieto-Merino, D;Tesch, F;Apfelbacher, C J;Arents, B W M;Barbarot, S;Baselga, E;Deleuran, M;Eichenfield, L F;Gerbens, L A A;Irvine, A D;Manca, A;Mendes-Bastos, P;Middelkamp-Hup, M A;Roberts, A;Seneschal, J;Svensson, Å;Thyssen, J P;Torres, T;Vermeulen, F M;Vestergaard, C;von Kobyletzki, L B;Wall, D;Weidinger, S;Schmitt, J;Flohr, C;
378 views DOI Abstract
1968
The ultrastructure of depigmented skin in kwashiorkor
Sims RT;;
Vol. 80 , No. 12 , pp. -
357 views Abstract
2017
Temporal trends in healthcare utilization following primary melanoma diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
Lott, J P;Wang, Q;Titus, L J;Onega, T;Nelson, H D;Weinstock, M A;Elmore, J G;Tosteson, A N A;
Vol. 177 , No. 3 , pp. 845-853
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lipidomic analysis of facial skin surface lipid reveals the altered lipid profile in infancy acne.
Zhou, M;Wang, H;Yang, M;He, C;Yang, M;Gao, Y;Jia, Y;
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring clinician-machine agreement in differential diagnoses for dermatology.
Eng, C;Liu, Y;Bhatnagar, R;
322 views DOI Abstract
View All 76 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.