journal of neuro-oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3456 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of neuro-oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j neurooncol
Abbreviated Name j neurooncol
ISSN 1573-7373
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/11060
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (73 total)

2020
Objective assessment of intraoperative tumor fluorescence reveals biological heterogeneity within glioblastomas: a biometric study.
Moiyadi, Aliasgar;Shetty, Prakash;Sridhar, Epari;Gota, Vikram;Gurjar, Murari;Saicharan, Ghantasala;Singh, Vikas;Srivastava, Sanjeeva;
Vol. 146 , No. 3 , pp. 477-488
339 views DOI Abstract
2020
Spatial distribution of malignant transformation in patients with low-grade glioma.
Jakola, Asgeir S;Bouget, David;Reinertsen, Ingerid;Skjulsvik, Anne J;Sagberg, Lisa Millgård;Bø, Hans Kristian;Gulati, Sasha;Sjåvik, Kristin;Solheim, Ole;
Vol. 146 , No. 2 , pp. 373-380
332 views DOI Abstract
2016
intravenous thrombolysis after reversal of dabigatran by idarucizumab: a case report
;Waldemar Kafke;Peter Kraft;Department of Neurology
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 140-144
326 views DOI Abstract
2014
anti-n-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis causing a prolonged depressive disorder evolving to inflammatory brain disease
;Sara Mariotto;Stefano Tamburin;Alessandro Salviati;Sergio Ferrari;Marco Zoccarato;Bruno Giometto;Laura Bertolasi;Franco Alessandrini;Maria Donata Benedetti;Salvatore Monaco
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 38-43
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
Phase II trial of an AKT inhibitor (perifosine) for recurrent glioblastoma.
Kaley, Thomas J;Panageas, Katherine S;Mellinghoff, Ingo K;Nolan, Craig;Gavrilovic, Igor T;DeAngelis, Lisa M;Abrey, Lauren E;Holland, Eric C;Lassman, Andrew B;
303 views DOI Abstract
2016
brown heroin-associated candida albicans ventriculitis and endopthalmitis treated with voriconazole
;Nora Elfiky;Kelly Baldwin
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 151-155
254 views DOI Abstract
2013
Multi-targeted DATS prevents tumor progression and promotes apoptosis in ectopic glioblastoma xenografts in SCID mice via HDAC inhibition
Gerald C. Wallace,Catherine P. Haar,W. Alex Vandergrift,Pierre Giglio,Yaenette N. Dixon-Mah,Abhay K. Varma,Swapan K. Ray,Sunil J. Patel,Naren L. Banik,Arabinda Das;Gerald C. Wallace;Catherine P. Haar;W. Alex Vandergrift;Pierre Giglio;Yaenette N. Dixon-Mah;Abhay K. Varma;Swapan K. Ray;Sunil J. Patel;Naren L. Banik;Arabinda Das;
Vol. 114 , No. 1 , pp. 43-50
244 views DOI Abstract
2018
a change of heart: yield of cardiac imaging in acute stroke workup
;Frans Kauw;Jan W. Dankbaar;Jesse Habets;Maarten J.M. Cramer;Hugo W.A.M. de Jong;Birgitta K. Velthuis;L. Jaap Kappelle
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 118-123
240 views DOI Abstract
2013
does intrathecal baclofen have a place in the treatment of painful spasms in friedreich ataxia
;Shala Ghaderi Berntsson;Anders Holtz;Atle Melberg
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 201-203
235 views DOI Abstract
2020
Rapamycin and hydroxychloroquine combination alters macrophage polarization and sensitizes glioblastoma to immune checkpoint inhibitors
Hsu, S.P.C.
Vol. 146 , pp. 417-426
234 views DOI
View All 73 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.