rural and remote health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5607 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 1 mês

rural and remote health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Nome Abreviado rural remote health
Nome Abreviado rural remote health
ISSN 1445-6354
Objetivo e Escopo
URL https://www.rrh.org.au
Instrucoes para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2018
Raising awareness of sensory impairment among community nurses: a brief intervention in a remote island setting.
Smith, Annetta;Shepherd, Ashley;Macaden, Leah;Macleod, Karen L;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 4548
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Precarious patients: health professionals' perspectives on providing care to Mexican and Jamaican migrants in Canada's Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program.
Cole, Donald C;McLaughlin, Janet E;Hennebry, Jenna L;Tew, Michelle A;
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 5313
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
Continued development of the Rural Active Living Perceived Environmental Support Scale (RALPESS): preliminary evidence for validity among American Indians.
Nolan, Rachael;Agley, Jon;Umstattd Meyer, M Renée;Spicer, Paul G;Hallam, Jeffrey S;
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 5200
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Unmet needs for family planning among married women aged 15-49 years living in two settlements with different socioeconomic and cultural characteristics: a cross-sectional study from Karabuk Province in Turkey.
Ozdemir, Raziye;Cevik, Celalettin;Ciceklioglu, Meltem;
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 5125
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
'We have to drive everywhere': rural nurses and their precepted students.
Yonge, Olive;Jackman, Deirdre;Luhanga, Florence;Myrick, Florence;Oosterbroek, Tracy;Foley, Vicki;
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 5347
354 views DOI Abstract
Recruiting undergraduates to rural practice: what the students can tell us.
Orpin, Peter;Gabriel, Michelle;
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 412
341 views Abstract
Development and feasibility testing of an education program to improve knowledge and self-care among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients with heart failure.
Clark, Robyn A;Fredericks, Bronwyn;Buitendyk, Natahlia J;Adams, Michael J;Howie-Esquivel, Jill;Dracup, Kathleen A;Berry, Narelle M;Atherton, John;Johnson, Stella;
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 3231
336 views Abstract
2020
Acute gastrointestinal illness in an African Indigenous population: the lived experience of Uganda's Batwa.
Patterson, Kaitlin;Clark, Sierra;Berrang-Ford, Lea;Lwasa, Shuaib;Namanya, Didacus;Twebaze, Fortunate;Team, Ihacc Research;Harper, Sherilee L;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 5141
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Status of coverage of MR vaccination, after supplementary immunization activities in a rural area of South India: a rapid immunization coverage survey.
Newtonraj, Ariarathinam;Vincent, Antony;Selvaraj, Kalaiselvi;Manikandan, Mani;
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 5261
318 views DOI Abstract
Relationship between income generating activities of rural women and their reproductive health behavior in Bangladesh.
Shariful Islam, Sheikh Mohammed;Mainuddin, Akm;
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 3216
316 views Abstract
View All 30 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.