Indexed in Journament

the clinical respiratory journal

ISSN 1752-699X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,799 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 49.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name clin respir j
Abbreviated Name clin respir j
ISSN 1752-699X
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1752699X

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the clinical respiratory journal
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 11.1 24.4
Innovation 66.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 81.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2019
Increased pulmonary artery diameter is associated with reduced FEV in former World Trade Center workers.
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Endocan as a marker of disease severity in pulmonary thromboembolism.
416 views DOI Abstract
2018
recent advances in the detection of neurotransmitters
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-
387 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prognostic significance of preoperative consolidation to maximum tumour diameter ratio and SUVmax in pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 71-77
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Could SUVmax be an auxiliary parameter in the clinical management of pulmonary hydatid disease?
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
375 views DOI Abstract
2018
Chest physiotherapy with early mobilization may improve extubation outcome in critically ill patients in the intensive care units.
Vol. 12 , No. 11 , pp. 2613-2621
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sleep disturbance in patients with mild-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors predicting in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia at a tertiary care hospital Karachi, Pakistan.
341 views DOI Abstract
2014
reliability of sensors based on nanowire networks when the electrical current is allowed to move in all directions
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 13-25
339 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prognostic significance of preoperative consolidation to maximum tumour diameter ratio and SUVmax in pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 71-77
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Could SUVmax be an auxiliary parameter in the clinical management of pulmonary hydatid disease?
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors predicting in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia at a tertiary care hospital Karachi, Pakistan.
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Endocan as a marker of disease severity in pulmonary thromboembolism.
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sleep disturbance in patients with mild-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increased pulmonary artery diameter is associated with reduced FEV in former World Trade Center workers.
419 views DOI Abstract
2018
metal oxide nanostructures in food applications: quality control and packaging
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 16-
327 views DOI Abstract
2018
recent advances in the detection of neurotransmitters
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-
387 views DOI Abstract
2018
Does advanced lung inflammation index (ALI) have prognostic significance in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer?
Vol. 12 , No. 6 , pp. 2013-2019
251 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,799 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

66.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.