Indexed in Journament

the clinical respiratory journal

ISSN 1752-699X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.2/100
Journament Score
#7,306
Journament Rank
19
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name clin respir j
Abbreviated Name clin respir j
ISSN 1752-699X
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1752699X

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2019
Endocan as a marker of disease severity in pulmonary thromboembolism.
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increased pulmonary artery diameter is associated with reduced FEV in former World Trade Center workers.
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Could SUVmax be an auxiliary parameter in the clinical management of pulmonary hydatid disease?
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
350 views DOI Abstract
2018
recent advances in the detection of neurotransmitters
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prognostic significance of preoperative consolidation to maximum tumour diameter ratio and SUVmax in pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 71-77
345 views DOI Abstract
2018
Chest physiotherapy with early mobilization may improve extubation outcome in critically ill patients in the intensive care units.
Vol. 12 , No. 11 , pp. 2613-2621
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sleep disturbance in patients with mild-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors predicting in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia at a tertiary care hospital Karachi, Pakistan.
323 views DOI Abstract
2014
reliability of sensors based on nanowire networks when the electrical current is allowed to move in all directions
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 13-25
317 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prognostic significance of preoperative consolidation to maximum tumour diameter ratio and SUVmax in pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 71-77
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Could SUVmax be an auxiliary parameter in the clinical management of pulmonary hydatid disease?
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors predicting in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia at a tertiary care hospital Karachi, Pakistan.
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Endocan as a marker of disease severity in pulmonary thromboembolism.
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sleep disturbance in patients with mild-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increased pulmonary artery diameter is associated with reduced FEV in former World Trade Center workers.
385 views DOI Abstract
2018
metal oxide nanostructures in food applications: quality control and packaging
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 16-
289 views DOI Abstract
2018
recent advances in the detection of neurotransmitters
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-
350 views DOI Abstract
2018
Does advanced lung inflammation index (ALI) have prognostic significance in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer?
Vol. 12 , No. 6 , pp. 2013-2019
227 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.