the clinical respiratory journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1066 / 33,945
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

the clinical respiratory journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name clin respir j
Abbreviated Name clin respir j
ISSN 1752-699X
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1752699X
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
Increased pulmonary artery diameter is associated with reduced FEV in former World Trade Center workers.
de la Hoz, Rafael E;Jeon, Yunho;Reeves, Anthony P;San José Estépar, Raúl;Liu, Xiaoyu;Doucette, John T;Celedón, Juan C;Nolan, Anna;
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Endocan as a marker of disease severity in pulmonary thromboembolism.
Kuluöztürk, Mutlu;İn, Erdal;İlhan, Nevin;
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Could SUVmax be an auxiliary parameter in the clinical management of pulmonary hydatid disease?
Ozmen, Ozlem;Tatci, Ebru;Uslu Biner, Inci;Findik, Gokturk;Yilmaz, Ulku;Erturk, Hakan;Demirag, Funda;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
321 views DOI Abstract
2018
recent advances in the detection of neurotransmitters
;Bo Si;Edward Song
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prognostic significance of preoperative consolidation to maximum tumour diameter ratio and SUVmax in pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
Akın Kabalak, Pınar;Yılmaz, Ülkü;Ertürk, Hakan;Özmen, Özlem;Demiröz, Şevki Mustafa;Demirağ, Funda;Kızılgöz, Derya;Kavurgacı, Suna;İnal Cengiz, Tuba;
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 71-77
317 views DOI Abstract
2018
Chest physiotherapy with early mobilization may improve extubation outcome in critically ill patients in the intensive care units.
Wang, Tsung-Hsien;Wu, Chin-Pyng;Wang, Li-Ying;
Vol. 12 , No. 11 , pp. 2613-2621
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sleep disturbance in patients with mild-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Lee, Sang Hee;Kim, Ki Uk;Lee, Haejung;Park, Hye-Kyung;Kim, Yun Seong;Lee, Min Ki;
311 views DOI Abstract
2020
Withdrawn: "Hypercapnia Attenuates Ventilator-induced Lung Injury through Vagus Nerve Activation" by Guang Li, Jiao Liu, Chen-Liang Zhou, Wen-Fang Xia and Di Zhang.
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 419
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors predicting in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia at a tertiary care hospital Karachi, Pakistan.
Iqbal, Nousheen;Irfan, Muhammad;Siddique, Faraz;Arshad, Verda;Zubairi, Ali Bin Sarwar;
293 views DOI Abstract
2014
reliability of sensors based on nanowire networks when the electrical current is allowed to move in all directions
;Nader Ebrahimi;Kristin McCullough
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 13-25
285 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.