Indexed in Journament

JMIR human factors

ISSN 2292-9495· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,793 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 76.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name JMIR Hum Factors
Abbreviated Name jmir hum factors
ISSN 2292-9495

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 15.0 19.1
Timeliness 50.0 9.2
Diversity 30.0 25.8
Innovation 40.0 27.4
Community Impact 35.5 7.8
Content Distribution 55.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2017
Workarounds Emerging From Electronic Health Record System Usage: Consequences for Patient Safety, Effectiveness of Care, and Efficiency of Care
Monique Jaspers;
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. e27-
806 views DOI Abstract
2019
Types and Frequency of Infusion Pump Alarms and Infusion-Interruption to Infusion-Recovery Times for Critical Short Half-Life Infusions: Retrospective Data Analysis.
Waterson, James;Bedner, Arkadiusz;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. e14123
401 views DOI Abstract
2017
Fall Prevention Self-Assessments Via Mobile 3D Visualization Technologies: Community Dwelling Older Adults' Perceptions of Opportunities and Challenges.
Hamm, Julian;Money, Arthur;Atwal, Anita;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. e15
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring How Professionals Within Agile Health Care Informatics Perceive Visualizations of Log File Analyses: Observational Study Followed by a Focus Group Interview.
Ten Klooster, Iris;Noordzij, Matthijs Leendert;Kelders, Saskia Marion;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e14424
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teamwork and Safety Attitudes in Complex Aortic Surgery at a Dutch Hospital: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Hilt, Alexander D;Kaptein, Ad A;Schalij, Martin J;van Schaik, Jan;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. e17131
321 views DOI Abstract
2021
Impact of Individual, Organizational, and Technological Factors on the Implementation of an Online Portal to Support a Clinical Pathway Addressing Psycho-Oncology Care: Mixed Methods Study
Joanne Shaw;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e26390-
308 views DOI Abstract
2021
Developing a Decision Aid to Facilitate Informed Decision Making About Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Lung Transplantation Among Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Usability Testing
Negin Hajizadeh;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e21270-
278 views DOI Abstract
2021
Identifying Barriers to and Opportunities for Telehealth Implementation Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic by Using a Human Factors Approach: A Leap Into the Future of Health Care Delivery?
Vignesh Subbian;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e24860-
273 views DOI Abstract
2021
Older Patients’ Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study
Tove Lindhardt;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e27005-
264 views DOI Abstract
2017
Workarounds Emerging From Electronic Health Record System Usage: Consequences for Patient Safety, Effectiveness of Care, and Efficiency of Care
Blijleven V;Koelemeijer K;Wetzels M;Jaspers M;;
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. -
260 views Abstract
2025
Improving Access to and Delivery of Maternal Health Care Services to Prevent Postpartum Hemorrhage in Selected States in Nigeria: Human-Centered Design Study.
Tijani, Bosun; Igbokwe, Uchenna; Filani, Temi; Adewemimo, Adefemi; Ameyan, Lola; Iyekekpolor, Martins; Karera, Steven; Oluyide, Olatunji; Ezike, Emmanuela; Akinreni, Temidayo; Ogefere, Obruche; Adetimilehin, Victor; Amasiatu, Valentine; Nwaokorie, Chukwunonso; Kangkum, Naanma; Fasawe, Olufunke; Aigbogun, Eric
Vol. 12 , pp. e58577
174 views DOI Abstract
2022
Acceptability and Feasibility of Wearable Transdermal Alcohol Sensors: Systematic Review.
Brobbin, Eileen;Deluca, Paolo;Hemrage, Sofia;Drummond, Colin;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. e40210
147 views DOI Abstract
2021
Older Patients’ Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study
Tove Lindhardt;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e27005-
264 views DOI Abstract
2021
Impact of an Educational Comic to Enhance Patient-Physician–Electronic Health Record Engagement: Prospective Observational Study
Wei Wei Lee;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e25054-
46 views DOI Abstract
2021
Comparing Single-Page, Multipage, and Conversational Digital Forms in Health Care: Usability Study
Aaron Peace;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e25787-
43 views DOI Abstract
2021
Development and Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: User-Centered Design Approach
Marisha Burden;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e24038-
232 views DOI Abstract
2021
Developing a Decision Aid to Facilitate Informed Decision Making About Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Lung Transplantation Among Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Usability Testing
Negin Hajizadeh;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e21270-
278 views DOI Abstract
2021
Impact of Individual, Organizational, and Technological Factors on the Implementation of an Online Portal to Support a Clinical Pathway Addressing Psycho-Oncology Care: Mixed Methods Study
Joanne Shaw;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e26390-
308 views DOI Abstract
2021
Identifying Barriers to and Opportunities for Telehealth Implementation Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic by Using a Human Factors Approach: A Leap Into the Future of Health Care Delivery?
Vignesh Subbian;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e24860-
273 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teamwork and Safety Attitudes in Complex Aortic Surgery at a Dutch Hospital: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Hilt, Alexander D;Kaptein, Ad A;Schalij, Martin J;van Schaik, Jan;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. e17131
321 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,793 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

55.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.