archiv fur rechts- und sozialphilosophie | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2057 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

archiv fur rechts- und sozialphilosophie

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name archiv fur rechts- und sozialphilosophie
Abbreviated Name archiv fur rechts- und sozialphilosophie
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2019
On the intellectual history of an ahistorical theory: John Rawl's theory of justice in the discursive context of history
Folkerts, J.
Vol. 105 , pp. 68-87
309 views DOI
2016
advances in genetic engineering of domestic animals
;Shaohua WANG,Kun ZHANG,Yunping DAI
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
266 views DOI Abstract
2015
achieving food security and high production of bioenergy crops through intercropping with efficient resource use in china
;Yuanmei ZUO,Zhenjiao ZHANG,Caihong LIU,Weina ZHANG
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 134-143
260 views DOI Abstract
2014
in vivo and in vitro development of tibetan antelope (pantholops hodgsonii) interspecific cloned embryos
;Guanghua SU,Lei CHENG,Yu GAO,Kun LIU,Zhuying WEI,Chunling BAI,Fengxia YIN,Li GAO,Guangpeng LI,Shorgan BOU
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 28-36
221 views DOI Abstract
2015
research and development of a novel subunit vaccine for the currently circulating pseudorabies virus variant in china
;Yuzhou WANG,Tongyan WANG,He YAN,Fanli YANG,Linghua GUO,Qingyuan YANG,Xule HU,Feifei TAN,Yan XIAO,Xiangdong LI,Kegong TIAN
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 216-222
201 views DOI Abstract
2014
managing nutrient for both food security and environmental sustainability in china: an experiment for the world
;Fusuo ZHANG, Zhenling CUI, Weifeng ZHANG
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 53-61
195 views DOI Abstract
2014
progress on major genes for high fecundity in ewes
;Qiuyue LIU,Zhangyuan PAN,Xiangyu WANG,Wenping HU,Ran DI,Yaxing YAO,Mingxing CHU
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 282-290
182 views DOI Abstract
2016
synthesis and characterization of castor oil-based polymeric surfactants
;Xujuan HUANG,He LIU,Shibin SHANG,Zhaosheng CAI,Jie SONG,Zhanqian SONG
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 46-54
173 views DOI Abstract
2016
uncertain and multi-objective programming models for crop planting structure optimization
;Mo LI,Ping GUO,Liudong ZHANG,Chenglong ZHANG
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 34-45
151 views DOI Abstract
2015
risk analysis methods of the water resources system under uncertainty
;Zeying GUI,Chenglong ZHANG,Mo Li,Ping GUO
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 205-215
143 views DOI Abstract
View All 12 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.