Indexed in Journament

Brain research

ISSN 1872-6240· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,815 of 29,297 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
406 Articles
Scores higher than 73.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Brain Res
Abbreviated Name brain res
ISSN 1872-6240
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/brain-research

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Brain research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 24.8
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.1
Content Distribution 16.4 89.1
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (406)

2019
1975
Optimal conditions for protein synthesis in incubated slices of rat brain
Vol. 99 , No. 2 , pp. -
458 views Abstract
2017
Effects of troxerutin on cognitive deficits and glutamate cysteine ligase subunits in the hippocampus of streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus rats.
Vol. 1657 , pp. 355-360
456 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effects of troxerutin on cognitive deficits and glutamate cysteine ligase subunits in the hippocampus of streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus rats.
Vol. 1657 , pp. 355-360
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial intelligence analysis of Newborn Leucocyte epigenomic markers for the Prediction of Autism.
Vol. 1724 , pp. 146457
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Central leptin signaling transmits positive valence Leptin transmits positive valence.
, pp. 146441
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analgesic effect of resveratrol on colitis-induced visceral pain via inhibition of TRAF6/NF-κB signaling pathway in the spinal cord.
Vol. 1724 , pp. 146464
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Semantic prediction-errors are context-dependent: An ERP study.
Vol. 1706 , pp. 86-92
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
English spoken word segmentation activates the prefrontal cortex and temporo-parietal junction in Chinese ESL learners: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.
Vol. 1733 , pp. 146693
387 views DOI Abstract
2026
Identity-by-descent to resolve reduced penetrance and advance gene discovery in neurodegenerative disease
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Imaging subtypes reveal distinct biological substrates and disability profiles in multiple sclerosis
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in late-onset metachromatic leukodystrophy
15 views DOI Abstract
2026
Exercise training reshapes motor planning and preparation networks in cervical dystonia
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Compromised striatal structure and function in mouse models of RARB-related disorder
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Brain fluorodeoxyglucose PET anatomical segmentation via AI: extensive validation in the neurodegenerative spectrum
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Resilience mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease: a domain-specific conceptual framework
14 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,815 of 29,297 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

16.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.