Indexed in Journament

anti-trafficking review

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,343 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
8 Articles
Scores higher than 92% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name anti-trafficking review
Abbreviated Name anti-trafficking review

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 15.0 20.4
Timeliness 50.0 5.8
Diversity 30.0 24.4
Innovation 40.0 25.7
Community Impact 34.0 5.8
Content Distribution 86.4 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2015
Debate: When it Comes to Modern Slavery, do Definitions Matter?
David, Fiona;
, No. 5 , pp. -
413 views Abstract
2018
Life after Trafficking in Azerbaijan: Reintegration experiences of survivors
McCarthy, Lauren;
, No. 10 , pp. 105-122
347 views Abstract
2018
‘What’s in a Name?’: Mislabelling, misidentification, and the US government’s failure to protect human trafficking survivors in the Central American refugee crisis
Soltis, Katherine;Walters, Rebecca;
, No. 1
334 views DOI
2017
Historicising ‘Irregular’ Migration from Senegal to Europe
Maher, Stephanie;
, No. 9 , pp. -
317 views Abstract
2018
From Passive Victims to Partners in Their Own Reintegration: Civil society’s role in empowering returned Thai fishermen
Rousseau, David;
, No. 10 , pp. 88-104
299 views Abstract
2012
Accountability and the Use of Raids to Fight Trafficking
Ditmore, Melissa;Thukral, Juhu;
, No. 1 , pp. -
260 views Abstract
2015
Re-evaluating Palermo: The case of Burmese women as Chinese brides
Hackney, Laura K;
, No. 4 , pp. -
259 views Abstract
2018
Consuming Life after Anti-Trafficking
Henriksen, Sofie;
, No. 10 , pp. -
255 views Abstract
2018
‘What’s in a Name?’: Mislabelling, misidentification, and the US government’s failure to protect human trafficking survivors in the Central American refugee crisis
Soltis, Katherine;Walters, Rebecca;
, No. 1
334 views DOI
2018
Life after Trafficking in Azerbaijan: Reintegration experiences of survivors
McCarthy, Lauren;
, No. 10 , pp. 105-122
347 views Abstract
2018
Consuming Life after Anti-Trafficking
Henriksen, Sofie;
, No. 10 , pp. -
255 views Abstract
2018
From Passive Victims to Partners in Their Own Reintegration: Civil society’s role in empowering returned Thai fishermen
Rousseau, David;
, No. 10 , pp. 88-104
299 views Abstract
2017
Historicising ‘Irregular’ Migration from Senegal to Europe
Maher, Stephanie;
, No. 9 , pp. -
317 views Abstract
2015
Debate: When it Comes to Modern Slavery, do Definitions Matter?
David, Fiona;
, No. 5 , pp. -
413 views Abstract
2015
Re-evaluating Palermo: The case of Burmese women as Chinese brides
Hackney, Laura K;
, No. 4 , pp. -
259 views Abstract
2012
Accountability and the Use of Raids to Fight Trafficking
Ditmore, Melissa;Thukral, Juhu;
, No. 1 , pp. -
260 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,343 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

86.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.