Indexed in Journament

British journal of anaesthesia

ISSN 1471-6771· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,295 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
48 Articles
Scores higher than 30.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nombre Corto Br J Anaesth
Nombre Abreviado br j anaesth
ISSN 1471-6771
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/british-journal-of-anaesthesia

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 12.9 11.5
Content Distribution 73.9 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (48)

2014
assessment of high school principal’s transformational leadership
;Nahiyah Jaidi Faraz
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. -
564 views Abstract
2018
Adoption of Lung Protective ventilation IN patients undergoing Emergency laparotomy: the ALPINE study. A prospective multicentre observational study.
Watson, X;Chereshneva, M;Odor, P M;Chis Ster, I;, ;Cecconi, M;
Vol. 121 , No. 4 , pp. 909-917
490 views DOI Abstract
2020
Challenging gender stereotypes and advancing inclusive leadership in the operating theatre.
Minehart, Rebecca D;Foldy, Erica Gabrielle;Long, Jennifer A;Weller, Jennifer M;
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
Potentiation by sevoflurane of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block is greater in older than younger adult patients: a randomised controlled trial.
Takagi, Shunichi;Kitajima, Osamu;Yamamoto, Mai;Matsui, Miki;Suzuki, Takahiro;
408 views DOI
2016
Patient reported outcome of adult perioperative anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional observational study.
Walker, E M K;Bell, M;Cook, T M;Grocott, M P W;Moonesinghe, S R;, ;, ;
Vol. 117 , No. 6 , pp. 758-766
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of dexmedetomidine on acute kidney injury after aortic surgery: a single-centre, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial.
Soh, Sarah;Shim, Jae-Kwang;Song, Jong-Wook;Bae, Jae-Chan;Kwak, Young-Lan;
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intraoperative ventilation strategies to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Deng, Qi-Wen;Tan, Wen-Cheng;Zhao, Bing-Cheng;Wen, Shi-Hong;Shen, Jian-Tong;Xu, Miao;
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chemokine receptor antagonists enhance the antinociceptive activity of oxycodone and meperidine on incisional pain in rats.
Inan, Saadet;Watson, Mia N;Doura, Menahem;Tallarida, Christopher S;Meissler, Joseph J;Chen, Xiaohong;Geller, Ellen B;Cowan, Alan;Rawls, Scott M;Eisenstein, Toby K;Adler, Martin W;
Vol. 122 , No. 6 , pp. e213-e215
376 views DOI
2020
Socioeconomic deprivation and mortality after emergency laparotomy: an observational epidemiological study.
Poulton, Thomas E;Moonesinghe, Ramani;Raine, Rosalind;Martin, Peter;, ;
Vol. 124 , No. 1 , pp. 73-83
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can anaesthetic-analgesic technique during cancer surgery of curative intent influence recurrence or metastasis? An update.
Buggy, Donal J;Wall, Tom;
Vol. 123 , No. 6 , pp. e525-e526
364 views DOI
2021
Anaesthetic depth and delirium after major surgery: a randomised clinical trial.
Evered, Lisbeth A;Chan, Matthew T V;Han, Ruquan;Chu, Mandy H M;Cheng, Benny P;Scott, David A;Pryor, Kane O;Sessler, Daniel I;Veselis, Robert;Frampton, Christopher;Sumner, Matthew;Ayeni, Ade;Myles, Paul S;Campbell, Douglas;Leslie, Kate;Short, Timothy G;
Vol. 127 , No. 5 , pp. 704-712
260 views DOI Abstract
2020
Potentiation by sevoflurane of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block is greater in older than younger adult patients: a randomised controlled trial.
Takagi, Shunichi;Kitajima, Osamu;Yamamoto, Mai;Matsui, Miki;Suzuki, Takahiro;
408 views DOI
2020
Socioeconomic deprivation and mortality after emergency laparotomy: an observational epidemiological study.
Poulton, Thomas E;Moonesinghe, Ramani;Raine, Rosalind;Martin, Peter;, ;
Vol. 124 , No. 1 , pp. 73-83
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of dexmedetomidine on acute kidney injury after aortic surgery: a single-centre, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial.
Soh, Sarah;Shim, Jae-Kwang;Song, Jong-Wook;Bae, Jae-Chan;Kwak, Young-Lan;
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intraoperative ventilation strategies to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Deng, Qi-Wen;Tan, Wen-Cheng;Zhao, Bing-Cheng;Wen, Shi-Hong;Shen, Jian-Tong;Xu, Miao;
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
Promoting anaesthetisia providers' non-technical skills through the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training (VAST) course in a low-resource setting.
Mossenson, Adam I;Tuyishime, Eugene;Rawson, David;Mukwesi, Christian;Whynot, Sara;Mackinnon, Sean P;Livingston, Patricia;
Vol. 124 , No. 2 , pp. 206-213
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Challenging gender stereotypes and advancing inclusive leadership in the operating theatre.
Minehart, Rebecca D;Foldy, Erica Gabrielle;Long, Jennifer A;Weller, Jennifer M;
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can anaesthetic-analgesic technique during cancer surgery of curative intent influence recurrence or metastasis? An update.
Buggy, Donal J;Wall, Tom;
Vol. 123 , No. 6 , pp. e525-e526
364 views DOI
2019
Chemokine receptor antagonists enhance the antinociceptive activity of oxycodone and meperidine on incisional pain in rats.
Inan, Saadet;Watson, Mia N;Doura, Menahem;Tallarida, Christopher S;Meissler, Joseph J;Chen, Xiaohong;Geller, Ellen B;Cowan, Alan;Rawls, Scott M;Eisenstein, Toby K;Adler, Martin W;
Vol. 122 , No. 6 , pp. e213-e215
376 views DOI
2018
Cancelled operations: a 7-day cohort study of planned adult inpatient surgery in 245 UK National Health Service hospitals.
Wong, D J N;Harris, S K;Moonesinghe, S R;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;
Vol. 121 , No. 4 , pp. 730-738
260 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,295 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.