Lancet (London, England) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1729 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Lancet (London, England)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Lancet
Abbreviated Name lancet
ISSN 1474-547X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-lancet
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (161 total)

2018
What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention
Hartvigsen J;Hancock MJ;Kongsted A;Louw Q;Ferreira ML;Genevay S;Hoy D;Karppinen J;Pransky G;Sieper J;Smeets RJ;Underwood M; ;;
Vol. 391 , No. 10137 , pp. -
670 views Abstract
2013
Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost?
Bhutta ZA;Das JK;Rizvi A;Gaffey MF;Walker N;Horton S;Webb P;Lartey A;Black RE; ;;
Vol. 382 , No. 9890 , pp. -
589 views Abstract
2013
Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries
Black RE;Victora CG;Walker SP;Bhutta ZA;Christian P;de Onis M;Ezzati M;Grantham-McGregor S;Katz J;Martorell R;Uauy R; ;;
Vol. 382 , No. 9890 , pp. -
586 views Abstract
1970
Efficacy of nine-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease in The Gambia: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Cutts FT;Zaman SM;Enwere G;Jaffar S;Levine OS;Okoko JB;Oluwalana C;Vaughan A;Obaro SK;Leach A;McAdam KP;Biney E;Saaka M;Onwuchekwa U;Yallop F;Pierce NF;Greenwood BM;Adegbola RA; ;;
Vol. 365 , No. 9465 , pp. -
560 views Abstract
2011
Effect of single-dose anthelmintic treatment during pregnancy on an infant's response to immunisation and on susceptibility to infectious diseases in infancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Webb EL;Mawa PA;Ndibazza J;Kizito D;Namatovu A;Kyosiimire-Lugemwa J;Nanteza B;Nampijja M;Muhangi L;Woodburn PW;Akurut H;Mpairwe H;Akello M;Lyadda N;Bukusuba J;Kihembo M;Kizza M;Kizindo R;Nabulime J;Ameke C;Namujju PB;Tweyongyere R;Muwanga M;Whitworth JA;Elliott AM;;
Vol. 377 , No. 9759 , pp. -
554 views Abstract
2010
Efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants in developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Armah GE;Sow SO;Breiman RF;Dallas MJ;Tapia MD;Feikin DR;Binka FN;Steele AD;Laserson KF;Ansah NA;Levine MM;Lewis K;Coia ML;Attah-Poku M;Ojwando J;Rivers SB;Victor JC;Nyambane G;Hodgson A;Schödel F;Ciarlet M;Neuzil KM;;
Vol. 376 , No. 9741 , pp. -
506 views Abstract
1993
AIDS: losing the battle and the war?
Potts, M;Carswell, W;
Vol. 341 , No. 8858 , pp. 1442-3
452 views
2016
Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium
Sallis JF;Bull F;Guthold R;Heath GW;Inoue S;Kelly P;Oyeyemi AL;Perez LG;Richards J;Hallal PC; ;;
Vol. 388 , No. 10051 , pp. -
447 views Abstract
2020
Refugees, asylum seekers, and immigrants in clinical trials.
Jindal, Rahul M;
Vol. 395 , No. 10217 , pp. 30-31
439 views DOI
2012
The effect of an integrated multisector model for achieving the Millennium Development Goals and improving child survival in rural sub-Saharan Africa: a non-randomised controlled assessment
Pronyk PM;Muniz M;Nemser B;Somers MA;McClellan L;Palm CA;Huynh UK;Ben Amor Y;Begashaw B;McArthur JW;Niang A;Sachs SE;Singh P;Teklehaimanot A;Sachs JD; ;;
Vol. 379 , No. 9832 , pp. -
432 views Abstract
View All 161 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.