Indexed in Journament

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology

ISSN 1435-4373· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,600 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 70.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
Abbreviated Name eur j clin microbiol infect dis
ISSN 1435-4373
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/10096

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 72.2 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.2
Content Distribution 36.2 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2000
Possible role of catheters in Saccharomyces boulardii fungemia
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. -
1,185 views Abstract
1988
Role of intestinal anaerobic bacteria in colonization resistance
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
534 views Abstract
2006
Pneumolysin polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and empyema in children
Vol. 25 , No. 12 , pp. -
463 views Abstract
2007
Streptococcus pneumoniae skin and soft tissue infections: characterization of causative strains and clinical illness
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. -
444 views Abstract
2019
Pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections: current state and future management.
436 views DOI Abstract
2017
How is post-mortem microbiology appraised by pathologists? Results from a practice survey conducted by ESGFOR.
Vol. 36 , No. 8 , pp. 1381-1385
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Essential in vitro diagnostics for advanced HIV and serious fungal diseases: international experts' consensus recommendations.
Vol. 38 , No. 9 , pp. 1581-1584
407 views DOI
2019
Redundant combinations of antianaerobic antimicrobials: impact of pharmacist-based prospective audit and feedback and prescription characteristics.
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Human polyomavirus KI, WU, BK, and JC in healthy volunteers.
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 135-139
368 views DOI Abstract
1992
Immediate and long-term efficacy of systemic antibiotics for eradicating nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
368 views Abstract
2020
Evaluation of respiratory syncytial virus IgG antibody dynamics in mother-infant pairs cohort.
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Essential in vitro diagnostics for advanced HIV and serious fungal diseases: international experts' consensus recommendations.
Vol. 38 , No. 9 , pp. 1581-1584
407 views DOI
2019
Treatment and recurrence on re-treatment tuberculosis patients: a randomized clinical trial and 7-year perspective cohort study in China.
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections: current state and future management.
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Human polyomavirus KI, WU, BK, and JC in healthy volunteers.
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 135-139
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Redundant combinations of antianaerobic antimicrobials: impact of pharmacist-based prospective audit and feedback and prescription characteristics.
399 views DOI Abstract
2017
How is post-mortem microbiology appraised by pathologists? Results from a practice survey conducted by ESGFOR.
Vol. 36 , No. 8 , pp. 1381-1385
417 views DOI Abstract
2016
avaliaÇÃo da qualidade da estratÉgia saÚde da famÍlia e do programa mais mÉdicos na Área rural de porto velho, rondÔnia.
Vol. 10 , No. 26 , pp. 1327-1346
142 views DOI Abstract
2016
editorial - janeiro/abril - 2016
Vol. 10 , No. 25 , pp. -
129 views DOI
2016
a percepÇÃo dos usuÁrios cearenses sobre o programa mais mÉdicos
Vol. 10 , No. 26 , pp. 1302-1312
211 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,600 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

36.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.