Indexed in Journament

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology

ISSN 1435-4373· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.1/100
Journament Score
#11,305
Journament Rank
40
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
Abbreviated Name eur j clin microbiol infect dis
ISSN 1435-4373
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/10096

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2000
Possible role of catheters in Saccharomyces boulardii fungemia
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. -
875 views Abstract
1988
Role of intestinal anaerobic bacteria in colonization resistance
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
502 views Abstract
2006
Pneumolysin polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and empyema in children
Vol. 25 , No. 12 , pp. -
428 views Abstract
2007
Streptococcus pneumoniae skin and soft tissue infections: characterization of causative strains and clinical illness
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. -
412 views Abstract
2019
Pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections: current state and future management.
402 views DOI Abstract
2017
How is post-mortem microbiology appraised by pathologists? Results from a practice survey conducted by ESGFOR.
Vol. 36 , No. 8 , pp. 1381-1385
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Essential in vitro diagnostics for advanced HIV and serious fungal diseases: international experts' consensus recommendations.
Vol. 38 , No. 9 , pp. 1581-1584
382 views DOI
2019
Redundant combinations of antianaerobic antimicrobials: impact of pharmacist-based prospective audit and feedback and prescription characteristics.
373 views DOI Abstract
1992
Immediate and long-term efficacy of systemic antibiotics for eradicating nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
342 views Abstract
2019
Human polyomavirus KI, WU, BK, and JC in healthy volunteers.
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 135-139
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of respiratory syncytial virus IgG antibody dynamics in mother-infant pairs cohort.
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Essential in vitro diagnostics for advanced HIV and serious fungal diseases: international experts' consensus recommendations.
Vol. 38 , No. 9 , pp. 1581-1584
382 views DOI
2019
Treatment and recurrence on re-treatment tuberculosis patients: a randomized clinical trial and 7-year perspective cohort study in China.
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections: current state and future management.
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Human polyomavirus KI, WU, BK, and JC in healthy volunteers.
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 135-139
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Redundant combinations of antianaerobic antimicrobials: impact of pharmacist-based prospective audit and feedback and prescription characteristics.
373 views DOI Abstract
2017
How is post-mortem microbiology appraised by pathologists? Results from a practice survey conducted by ESGFOR.
Vol. 36 , No. 8 , pp. 1381-1385
396 views DOI Abstract
2016
avaliaÇÃo da qualidade da estratÉgia saÚde da famÍlia e do programa mais mÉdicos na Área rural de porto velho, rondÔnia.
Vol. 10 , No. 26 , pp. 1327-1346
122 views DOI Abstract
2016
editorial - janeiro/abril - 2016
Vol. 10 , No. 25 , pp. -
105 views DOI
2016
a percepÇÃo dos usuÁrios cearenses sobre o programa mais mÉdicos
Vol. 10 , No. 26 , pp. 1302-1312
169 views DOI Abstract
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

35.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.