acta cardiologica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3284 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

acta cardiologica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name acta cardiol
Abbreviated Name acta cardiol
ISSN 0001-5385
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.actacardiologica.be
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2017
Galectin-3 correlates with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and predicts the risk of ventricular -arrhythmias in patients with implantable defibrillators.
Oz, Fahrettin;Onur, Imran;Elitok, Ali;Ademoglu, Evin;Altun, Ibrahim;Bilge, Ahmet Kaya;Adalet, Kamil;
Vol. 72 , No. 4 , pp. 453-459
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
15-Year lipid profile effects on cardiovascular events adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors: a cohort study from Middle-East.
Sadeghi, Masoumeh;Golshahi, Jafar;Talaei, Mohammad;Sheikhbahaei, Erfan;Ghodjani, Erfan;Mansouri, Mohammadhadi;Mansouri, Pejman;Sarrafzadegan, Nizal;Roohafza, Hamidreza;
, pp. 1-6
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diabetes mellitus is not associated with worse vascular outcome following percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Lareyre, Fabien;Mialhe, Claude;Bourlon, François;Habib, Yacoub;Dommerc, Carine;Raffort, Juliette;
Vol. 74 , No. 6 , pp. 480-486
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mitral annular calcification predicted major cardiovascular events in patients presented with acute coronary syndrome and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.
Çetin, Mustafa;Duman, Hakan;Özer, Savaş;Kırış, Tuncay;Çinier, Göksel;Usta, Ece;Satılmış, Seçkin;Erdoğan, Turan;
, pp. 1-7
283 views DOI Abstract
2013
autoimmune t-cell reactivity to myelin proteolipids and glycolipids in multiple sclerosis
;Judith M. Greer
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
264 views DOI Abstract
2014
gray matters in multiple sclerosis: cognitive impairment and structural mri
;Silvia Messina;Francesco Patti
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2013
the contribution of resting state networks to the study of cortical reorganization in ms
;Rosaria Sacco;Simona Bonavita;Fabrizio Esposito;Gioacchino Tedeschi;Antonio Gallo
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
233 views DOI Abstract
2015
prevalence of depression and anxiety among patients with multiple sclerosis attending the ms clinic at sheikh khalifa medical city, uae: cross-sectional study
;Taoufik Alsaadi;Khadija El Hammasi;Tarek M. Shahrour;Mustafa Shakra;Lamya Turkawi;Abdulla Mudhafar;Lina Diab;Mufeed Raoof
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
225 views DOI Abstract
2019
An interesting case of wide QRS tachycardia with left bundle branch block morphology
Mohanan, Nair K.
Vol. 74 , pp. 433-434
214 views DOI
2015
the therapeutic potential of the ketogenic diet in treating progressive multiple sclerosis
;Mithu Storoni;Gordon T. Plant
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
191 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.