the american journal of the medical sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3570 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

the american journal of the medical sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name am j med sci
Abbreviated Name am j med sci
ISSN 1538-2990
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-american-journal-of-the-medical-sciences
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2006
Risk factors for recurrent lower extremity cellulitis in a U.S. Veterans Medical Center population
Lewis SD;Peter GS;Gómez-Marín O;Bisno AL;;
Vol. 332 , No. 6 , pp. -
359 views Abstract
2016
Peri-Infarction Zone as a Risk Marker for Patients With Postmyocardial Infarction.
Golcuk, Ebru;Yalin, Kivanc;Aksu, Tolga;Tiryakioglu, Selma Kenar;Bilge, Ahmet Kaya;Adalet, Kamil;
Vol. 351 , No. 5 , pp. 452-8
334 views DOI Abstract
2018
methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorder: dermoscopic features
;Takeshi Namiki;Yumiko Sone;Keiko Miura;Masaru Tanaka;Hiroo Yokozeki
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 149-153
316 views DOI Abstract
2018
Correlations of Circulating Cell-Free DNA With Clinical Manifestations in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Xie, Jin;Yang, Jiawei;Hu, Pei;
Vol. 356 , No. 2 , pp. 121-129
310 views DOI Abstract
2015
Distinguishing Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy From Idiopathic Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Tachycardia with T-wave Alternans.
Yalin, Kivanc;Golcuk, Ebru;Aksu, Tolga;Tiryakioglu, Selma K;Bilge, Ahmet K;Adalet, Kamil;
Vol. 350 , No. 6 , pp. 463-6
293 views DOI Abstract
2018
Galectin-3: A Novel Biomarker Predicts Sudden Cardiac Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Emet, Samim;Dadashov, Mubariz;Sonsoz, Mehmet Rasih;Cakir, Mustafa Ozan;Yilmaz, Mustafa;Elitok, Ali;Bilge, Ahmet Kaya;Mercanoglu, Fehmi;Oncul, Aytac;Adalet, Kamil;Onur, Imran;
Vol. 356 , No. 6 , pp. 537-543
289 views DOI Abstract
2013
primary dermal melanoma in a patient with a history of multiple malignancies: a case report with molecular characterization
;Germana Sini;Maria Colombino;Amelia Lissia;Sara Maxia;Marcello Gulino;Panagiotis Paliogiannis;Grazia Palomba;Giuseppe Palmieri;Antonio Cossu;Corrado Rubino
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 192-197
287 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimal Blood Pressure in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease: HIJ-CREATE Substudy.
Tanaka, Kazuki;Jujo, Kentaro;Yamaguchi, Junichi;Ogawa, Hiroshi;Hagiwara, Nobuhisa;
Vol. 358 , No. 3 , pp. 219-226
285 views DOI Abstract
2014
rapid partial repigmentation of vitiligo in a young female adult with a gluten-free diet
;Birgit N. Khandalavala;Maya C. Nirmalraj
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 283-287
261 views DOI Abstract
2013
a case of lichen planus pemphigoides successfully treated with a combination of cyclosporine a and prednisolone
;Ken Washio;Atsuko Nakamura;Shunpei Fukuda;Takashi Hashimoto;Tatsuya Horikawa
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 84-87
249 views DOI Abstract
View All 35 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.