afyon kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari bilimler fakültesi dergisi | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1789 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

afyon kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari bilimler fakültesi dergisi

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name afyon kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari bilimler fakültesi dergisi
Abbreviated Name afyon kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari bilimler fakültesi dergisi
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2014
characterization of partially purified bacteriocin like substance (blis) produced by probiotic lactobacillus strains
;Saeed Ismail Khanian;Naheed Mojgani
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 8-
523 views DOI Abstract
2017
antibacterial evaluation of ethnomedicinal plants used against diarrhea in niger, western africa
;Lawaly Maman Manzo;Moussa Idrissa;Khalid Ikhiri
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 54-58
471 views DOI Abstract
2016
phenotypic detection of esbl, mbl (imp-1), and ampc enzymes, and their coexistence in enterobacter and klebsiella species isolated fromclinical specimens
;Zahra Shahandeh;Farahnaz Sadighian;Khadije Beigom Rekabpor
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 8-
453 views DOI Abstract
2016
the effect of aquablend avian probiotic®including lactobacillus, streptococcus and bifidobacterium on systemic antibody response against newcastle and influenza disease vaccine in broiler chickens
;Forough Talazadeh;Mansoor Mayahi;Safieh Zeinali
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 10-
399 views DOI Abstract
2017
BİR ETİK TÜKETİM ARACI OLARAK ADİL TİCARET
EROL, Fuat ;
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 143-154
333 views Abstract
2015
A CLASSIFICATION ON THE CONCEPT OF GOVERNANCE
Demirtaş, Gökhan ;, ;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 141-165
331 views Abstract
2015
İŞ ETİĞİ VE İNSAN KAYNAKLARI YÖNETİMİ İLİŞKİSİ: İNSAN KAYNAKLARI YÖNETİMİ FONKSİYONLARI BAZINDA BİR TARTIŞMA
BAYRAKTAROĞLU, Serkan ;, ;YILMAZ, Sevdiye ERSOY;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1-23
299 views Abstract
2015
SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR İŞLETMELER İÇİN KURUMSAL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE İÇSEL UNSURLARI
KUŞAT, Nurdan ;, ;
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 227-242
283 views Abstract
2015
AVRUPA KENTSEL ŞARTLARI PERSPEKTİFİNDE BİR KENTLİ HAKKI OLARAK "KATILIM HAKKI" VE TÜRKİYE
Pektaş, Ethem Kadri ;, ;Akın, Fehmi ;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 23-49
268 views Abstract
2015
SÖZEL, SAYISAL VE EŞİT AĞIRLIK BÖLÜMLERİNDE OKUYAN ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK EĞİLİMLERİNİN BAZI DEMOGRAFİK DEĞİŞKENLER AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ: SDÜ ÖRNEĞİ
AKÇAKANAT, Tahsin ;, ;MÜCEVHER, Muhammet Hamdi ;ÇARIKÇI, İlker Hüseyin ;
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 137-153
252 views Abstract
View All 23 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.