Indexed in Journament

Çankırı karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari bilimler fakültesi dergisi

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,219 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
35 Articles
Scores higher than 61.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Çankırı karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari bilimler fakültesi dergisi
Abbreviated Name Çankırı karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari bilimler fakültesi dergisi
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 62.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 62.2 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2012
Integration of Public Finance Administration into ISO 9001 Total Quality Management
KİTAPÇI, Hakan;ERDOĞAN, Ömer;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 39-61
388 views Abstract
2013
Forensic Accounting Profession and Prevention of Money Laundering
KASAP, Murat;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 121-132
387 views Abstract
2008
construction workers perceptions toward safety culture
;Andi Andi
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
364 views Abstract
2013
Turkish Banking Sector Credit-Deposit Developments Regionally Analysis (2005-2011)
HAZAR, Adalet;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 93-119
359 views Abstract
2015
Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin İşgören Performansına Etkisinde Çalışanların Örgütsel Adalet Algılarının Rolü
TURGUT, Hakan ;TOKMAK, İsmail ;ATEŞ, M.Fikret ;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 417-442
356 views Abstract
2013
Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Kredi-Mevduat Gelişmelerinin Bölgesel Analizi (2005-2011)
HAZAR, Adalet ;BABUŞCU, Şenol ;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 93-119
340 views Abstract
2012
Kamu Mali Yönetiminin ISO 9001 Kalite Yönetim Sistemine Entegrasyonu
KİTAPÇI, Hakan ;ERDOĞAN, Ömer ;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 39-61
310 views Abstract
2004
rancang bangun alat uji permeabilitas beton
;Handoko Sugiharto;Allan Surya;Koeshardiono Wibowo;Wong Foek Tjong
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 94-100
307 views Abstract
2017
16 Nisan 2017 Halk Oylaması ve Halk Oylaması Sürecinin Siyaset Bilimi Ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Öğrencileri Tarafından Algılanmasına İlişkin Bir Araştırma: Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Örneği
ÖZDEMİR, Gürbüz ;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 247-280
294 views Abstract
2012
Çalışan İlişkileri Ve Bilgi Paylaşımı: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama
KARAVARDAR, Gülşah ;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 143-156
284 views Abstract
2017
bolt spacing and end distance of bolted connection of laminated veneer lumber (lvl) sengon
;Ali Awaludin;Dani Nugroho Saputro
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
197 views Abstract
2017
16 Nisan 2017 Halk Oylaması ve Halk Oylaması Sürecinin Siyaset Bilimi Ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Öğrencileri Tarafından Algılanmasına İlişkin Bir Araştırma: Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Örneği
ÖZDEMİR, Gürbüz ;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 247-280
294 views Abstract
2016
managing pre-construction and construction risks on project sites in abuja-nigeria
;Jimoh R.A.;Sani M.A.;Adoza A.I.;Yahaya I.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
19 views Abstract
2015
seismic waves scattering impact through tunnel excavation on adjacent monuments subjected to far field earthquakes
;Ghobakhloo E.;Pourlak M.;Razmkhah A.
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 59-66
72 views Abstract
2015
architecture and structure – just a simple love affair
;Grohmann M.
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 140-151
19 views Abstract
2015
strategies for overcoming barriers to improving safety in small construction organisations
;Sunindijo R.Y.
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 117-125
107 views Abstract
2015
community-based approach in a small scale irrigation project in indonesia: ways and advantages
;Istijono B.;Ophiyandri T.
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 95-100
155 views Abstract
2015
Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin İşgören Performansına Etkisinde Çalışanların Örgütsel Adalet Algılarının Rolü
TURGUT, Hakan ;TOKMAK, İsmail ;ATEŞ, M.Fikret ;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 417-442
356 views Abstract
2014
correlations between damage indices and seismic parameters for near-field earthquake records
;Soleymani, A.;Safi, M.
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 75-86
125 views Abstract
2014
travel time estimation and prediction using mobile phones: a cost effective method for developing countries
;Satyakumar, M.;Anil, R.;Sivakumar, B.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 33-39
202 views Abstract
Journament Score
35.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,219 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.