Indexed in Journament

nobel medicus

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,114 of 29,301 scored journals (34,035 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name nobel medicus
Abbreviated Name nobel medicus
URL https://www.nobelmedicus.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for nobel medicus
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.6
Accessibility 35.0 23.3
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 9.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 6.8
Content Distribution 72.1 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2017
long-term outcomes and toxicities of a large cohort of anal cancer patients treated with dose-painted imrt per rtog 0529
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 110-117
566 views DOI Abstract
2018
internal dose escalation is associated with increased local control for non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (srs)
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 146-153
480 views Abstract
2016
management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 294-299
376 views DOI Abstract
2016
feasibility of 4d perfusion ct imaging for the assessment of liver treatment response following sbrt and sorafenib
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 194-203
354 views DOI Abstract
2016
dosimetric analysis of varying cord planning organ at risk volume in spine stereotactic body radiation therapy
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 76-81
327 views DOI Abstract
2016
sentinel lymph node imaging guided imrt for prostate cancer: individualized pelvic radiation therapy versus rtog guidelines
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 51-58
303 views DOI Abstract
2016
stereotactic body radiotherapy (sbrt) for locally advanced extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 237-243
294 views DOI Abstract
2018
serum cytokine profiles and metabolic tumor burden in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing palliative thoracic radiation therapy
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 130-138
279 views Abstract
2018
internal dose escalation is associated with increased local control for non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (srs)
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 146-153
480 views Abstract
2018
obsessive-compulsive disorder after therapy for an optic pathway glioma
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 30-33
226 views DOI
2018
serum cytokine profiles and metabolic tumor burden in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing palliative thoracic radiation therapy
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 130-138
279 views Abstract
2018
congenital ichthyosis patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin who received concurrent chemoradiation: a case report
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 76-80
207 views DOI
2018
outcomes and toxicity from a prospective study of moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 163-169
272 views Abstract
2017
long-term outcomes and toxicities of a large cohort of anal cancer patients treated with dose-painted imrt per rtog 0529
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 110-117
566 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
24.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,114 of 29,301 scored
(34,035 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

24.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

9.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.