Indexed in Journament

düzce Üniversitesi bilim ve teknoloji dergisi

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,538 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 74.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name düzce Üniversitesi bilim ve teknoloji dergisi
Abbreviated Name düzce Üniversitesi bilim ve teknoloji dergisi
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 61.5
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 52.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for düzce Üniversitesi bilim ve teknoloji dergisi
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 61.5 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 52.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2013
2016
Güç Sistemi Kararlılığını İyileştirecek Facts Cihazlarının Bağlantı Noktasının Belirlenmesi
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 0-0
507 views Abstract
2017
Toksoplazma gondii’nin insan ve hayvan sağlığı açısından önemi
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 582-599
433 views Abstract
2018
Entamoeba histolytica’nın İnsan ve Hayvan Sağlığı Açısından Önemi
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 275-291
420 views Abstract
2014
Düzce İlinde Arıcılığın Yapısı ve Arıcılık Faaliyetleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
406 views Abstract
2016
Kırıkkale Şehir İçi Ulaşımda Alternatif Sistem Değerlendirmesi
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 0-0
392 views Abstract
2018
2013
transdermal delivery of small interfering rna with elastic cationic liposomes in mice
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
357 views DOI Abstract
2015
Düzce Orman Ürünleri Sanayi İşletmelerinin Yeşil Pazarlama Konusunda Tutum ve Davranışlarının İncelenmesi
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 633-643
349 views Abstract
2014
Düzce University
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 219-225
337 views Abstract
2023
HCT116 ve HT29 Kolon Kanseri Hücrelerinde 5-Florourasil Kaynaklı Hücre Ölümünün Fourier Dönüşümlü Kızılötesi Spektroskopisi ile İncelenmesi
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 524-535
74 views Abstract
2018
Geri Dönüştürülmüş Lastik Atık İkameli Poliüretan Dolgulu Kompozit Panellerin Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 1224-1233
50 views Abstract
2018
Konik Kalorimetre ile Barit İlaveli Rijit Poliüretan Köpük Malzemelerin Yanma Davranışlarının İncelenmesi
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 706-713
27 views Abstract
2018
AG Dağıtım Şebekelerinde Kaçak Kullanımın Tespiti ve Otomatik Faturalama İçin Örnek Laboratuvar Çalışması
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 1178-1189
25 views Abstract
2018
Entamoeba histolytica’nın İnsan ve Hayvan Sağlığı Açısından Önemi
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 275-291
420 views Abstract
2018
2017
Talaş Kaldırma İşlemlerinde Takım Durumunun İzlemesi İçin Son Gelişmelerin İncelenmesi
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 314-337
114 views Abstract
2017
Toksoplazma gondii’nin insan ve hayvan sağlığı açısından önemi
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 582-599
433 views Abstract
2016
novel concepts for drug hypersensitivity based on the use of long-time scale molecular dynamic simulation
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
245 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,538 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

61.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

52.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.