Indexed in Journament

AIP Conference Proceedings

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,796 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
234 Articles
Scores higher than 70% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name AIP Conference Proceedings
Abbreviated Name aip conference proceedings

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 38.9
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 67.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 38.9 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 67.1 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (234)

2019
QbD approach in RP-HPLC method development for the assay of benzocaine and diclofenac in dosage forms
Manikandan, K.
Vol. 2112 , pp. 0-0
443 views DOI
2018
Characteristic of folic acid monomer and distribution af both fermented broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) and spinach (Amaranthus sp.) for forticant of natural nano folate
Susilowati A.
Vol. 2049 , pp. 0-0
407 views DOI
2015
ganho de peso, consumo de ração e histologia de órgãos de leitões alimentados com rações contendo baixos níveis de fumonisina b1
;Pollyana C.M.C. Souto;Leandra N.Z. Ramalho;Fernando S. Ramalho;Mayra C. Gregorio;Keliani Bordin;Anne-Marie Cossalter;Isabelle P. Oswald;Carlos A.F. Oliveira
Vol. 35 , No. 5 , pp. 451-455
368 views DOI Abstract
2007
fibrinonecrotic enteritis of piglets in a commercial farm: a postmortem study of the prevalence and the role of lesion associated agents isospora suis and clostridium perfringens enterite fibrinonecrótica em leitões de uma granja comercial: estudo pós-morte da prevalência e associação da lesão com isospora suis e clostridium perfringens
;Macarena G. Sanz;Lucila Venturini;Ronnie A. Assis;Francisco Uzal;Miguel A. Risso;Julio R. Idiart;Carlos J. Perfumo
Vol. 27 , No. 7 , pp. 297-300
359 views DOI Abstract
2010
mastite em pequenos ruminantes no brasil small ruminant mastitis in brazil
;Rodolfo de M. Peixoto;Rinaldo Aparecido Mota;Mateus M. da Costa
Vol. 30 , No. 9 , pp. 754-762
358 views DOI Abstract
histological features of the placenta and their relation to the gross and data from thoroughbred mares
;Fernanda M. Pazinato;Bruna R. Curcio;Cristina G. Fernandes;Lorena S. Feijó;Rubia A. Schmith;Carlos E.W. Nogueira
Vol. 36 , No. 7 , pp. 665-670
352 views DOI Abstract
development of the central nervous system in guinea pig (cavia porcellus, rodentia, caviidae)
;Fernanda Menezes de Oliveira e Silva;Dayane Alcantara;Rafael Cardoso Carvalho;Phelipe Oliveira Favaron;Amilton Cesar dos Santos;Diego Carvalho Viana;Maria Angelica Miglino
Vol. 36 , No. 8 , pp. 753-760
351 views DOI Abstract
2016
Determination of indoor radon concentrations at the elementary schools of Fatih district in Istanbul
Kurt, A.
Vol. 1722 , pp. 0-0
338 views DOI
2019
Development status, prospects and industrial policies of nanomaterials and nanotechnology
Xiao, B.
Vol. 2185 , pp. 0-0
332 views DOI
2015
the role of alveolar type ii cells in swine leptospirosis
;Ângela P. Campos;Dayane F.H. Miranda;Geórgia B.B. Alves;Micherlene S. Carneiro;Maria G. Prianti;Larissa M.F. Gonçalves;Vanessa Castro;Francisco A.L. Costa
Vol. 35 , No. 7 , pp. 620-626
331 views DOI Abstract
2024
Chemical teachers perception about chemical literacy, cognitive learning strategies and self-efficacy in high school students
Sari, Indayana Ratna;Sutrisno, Hari;Purwaningsih, Dyah;
Vol. 3081 , pp. 050007
59 views DOI
2024
Planning and evaluation of the university green canteen construction development project
Sirajuddin,
Vol. 2891 , pp. 0-0
20 views DOI
2023
An Efficient Multimodality Framework for Locker Protection with Live Image Authentication
Reddy, M.R.
Vol. 2855 , pp. 0-0
52 views DOI
2023
Analysis of alternate material for bumpers using ULTEM and ABS
Abraham, J.D.A.P.
Vol. 2869 , pp. 0-0
35 views DOI
2023
Study ethnomathematics: Investigation of mathematical ideas on Minangkabau traditional songket in Pandai Sick
Rurisman,
Vol. 2698 , pp. 0-0
49 views DOI
2022
Mobile news applications quality analysis using web quality and importance performance analysis
Nugraha, A.
Vol. 2453 , pp. 0-0
66 views DOI
2022
Telegram and discord as a part in control system
Penkov, S.
Vol. 2449 , pp. 0-0
77 views DOI
2021
Partial least squares approach for predicting turnover intention: The role of workplace violence and burnout among medical frontliners in Malaysia
Kassim, M.A.M.
Vol. 2339 , pp. 0-0
73 views DOI
2020
Toxicity of benzyl benzoate from Kaempferia rotunda L. rhizome
Diastuti, H.
Vol. 2237 , pp. 0-0
89 views DOI
2020
Study of thermal conductivity of Fe<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> nanoparticles coated with TEOS
Dayana, I.
Vol. 2221 , pp. 0-0
103 views DOI
Journament Score
39.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,796 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.