AIP Conference Proceedings | Journament

Journal Ranking

#981 / 33,917
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

AIP Conference Proceedings

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name AIP Conference Proceedings
Abbreviated Name aip conference proceedings
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (234 total)

2019
QbD approach in RP-HPLC method development for the assay of benzocaine and diclofenac in dosage forms
Manikandan, K.
Vol. 2112 , pp. 0-0
411 views DOI
2018
Characteristic of folic acid monomer and distribution af both fermented broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) and spinach (Amaranthus sp.) for forticant of natural nano folate
Susilowati A.
Vol. 2049 , pp. 0-0
376 views DOI
2015
ganho de peso, consumo de ração e histologia de órgãos de leitões alimentados com rações contendo baixos níveis de fumonisina b1
;Pollyana C.M.C. Souto;Leandra N.Z. Ramalho;Fernando S. Ramalho;Mayra C. Gregorio;Keliani Bordin;Anne-Marie Cossalter;Isabelle P. Oswald;Carlos A.F. Oliveira
Vol. 35 , No. 5 , pp. 451-455
332 views DOI Abstract
2010
mastite em pequenos ruminantes no brasil small ruminant mastitis in brazil
;Rodolfo de M. Peixoto;Rinaldo Aparecido Mota;Mateus M. da Costa
Vol. 30 , No. 9 , pp. 754-762
314 views DOI Abstract
2016
Determination of indoor radon concentrations at the elementary schools of Fatih district in Istanbul
Kurt, A.
Vol. 1722 , pp. 0-0
306 views DOI
histological features of the placenta and their relation to the gross and data from thoroughbred mares
;Fernanda M. Pazinato;Bruna R. Curcio;Cristina G. Fernandes;Lorena S. Feijó;Rubia A. Schmith;Carlos E.W. Nogueira
Vol. 36 , No. 7 , pp. 665-670
304 views DOI Abstract
2007
fibrinonecrotic enteritis of piglets in a commercial farm: a postmortem study of the prevalence and the role of lesion associated agents isospora suis and clostridium perfringens enterite fibrinonecrótica em leitões de uma granja comercial: estudo pós-morte da prevalência e associação da lesão com isospora suis e clostridium perfringens
;Macarena G. Sanz;Lucila Venturini;Ronnie A. Assis;Francisco Uzal;Miguel A. Risso;Julio R. Idiart;Carlos J. Perfumo
Vol. 27 , No. 7 , pp. 297-300
302 views DOI Abstract
2015
the role of alveolar type ii cells in swine leptospirosis
;Ângela P. Campos;Dayane F.H. Miranda;Geórgia B.B. Alves;Micherlene S. Carneiro;Maria G. Prianti;Larissa M.F. Gonçalves;Vanessa Castro;Francisco A.L. Costa
Vol. 35 , No. 7 , pp. 620-626
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improved multiferroic properties of cobalt ferrite and sodium bismuth titanate based multiferroic composites
Bhasin, T.
Vol. 2115 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2019
Development status, prospects and industrial policies of nanomaterials and nanotechnology
Xiao, B.
Vol. 2185 , pp. 0-0
289 views DOI
View All 234 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.