Indexed in Journament

soil dynamics and earthquake engineering

ISSN 0267-7261· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,053 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
35 Articles
Scores higher than 72.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name soil dynamics and earthquake engineering
Abbreviated Name soil dynamics and earthquake engineering
ISSN 0267-7261
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/soil-dynamics-and-earthquake-engineering

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 40.7 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.2
Content Distribution 74.0 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2014
research on the correlation between the age at the first calving and milk production characters
;Agatha POPESCU
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 297-306
400 views Abstract
2014
issues concerning the typology of rural touristic pensions form marginimea sibiului, sibiu county, romania
;Mirela STANCIU;Maria TĂNASE;Monica GĂUREANU
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 273-278
336 views Abstract
2013
studies regarding the density dynamics of avena fatua weed species on wheat cultivated in monoculture (2 and 3 years) and in the wheat–rape crop rotation on burnas platform (alexandria)
;Mihai BERCA;Roxana HOROIAŞ
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 37-42
323 views Abstract
2016
Response of the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Suspension Bridge under spatially varying multi-point earthquake excitations
Apaydin, N.
Vol. 84 , pp. 44-54
317 views DOI
2015
position and perspectives of development of the food processing sector in montenegro
;Miomir JOVANOVIĆ;Aleksandra DESPOTOVIĆ;Miljan JOKSIMOVIĆ
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 233-238
315 views Abstract
2013
influence of humic nature substances (lg) on the polypeptide polymorphisms of some glycine max l. sorts with different resistance to drought
;Ana BIRSAN;Gheorghe JIGAU;Lilia GROSU
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 59-62
305 views Abstract
2013
study considering the environmental protection and life quality in romania in the context of sustainable development
;Gheorghe Sebastian SÂRB;Teodor MATEOC;Nicoleta MATEOC SIRB;Anişoara DUMA-COPCEA;Ioan GRAD;Gabriel ŞUSTER
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 257-262
303 views Abstract
2015
reducing nitrate leaching from soddy-podzolic sandy loam soil when applying poultry manure in combination with barley
;Irina RUSAKOVA
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 433-436
300 views Abstract
2014
factor analysis of labor productivity in agriculture in terms of sustainable development
;Irina Elena PETRESCU
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 247-252
295 views Abstract
2014
endogenous determinants of investments in farms of selected countries of central and eastern europe
;Dariusz KUSZ;Stanislaw GEDEK;Maria RUDA;Stanislaw ZAJAC
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 107-116
281 views Abstract
2020
Performance evaluation of a MICP-treated calcareous sandy foundation using shake table tests
Zhang, X.
Vol. 129 , pp. 0-0
207 views DOI
2020
The September 19, 2017 Mw 7.1 Puebla-Mexico City earthquake: Observed rockfall and landslide activity
Montgomery, J.
Vol. 130 , pp. 0-0
224 views DOI
2020
Ground motion rotation for mainshock-aftershock sequences: Necessary or not?
Wen, W.
Vol. 130 , pp. 0-0
173 views DOI
2019
Treatment of uncertainties in seismic fragility assessment of RC frames with masonry infill walls
Choudhury, T.
Vol. 126 , pp. 0-0
220 views DOI
2018
Nonlinear soil-structure interaction analysis in poroelastic soil using mid-point integrated finite elements and perfectly matched discrete layers
Jin Ho Lee;Jin Ho Lee;
Vol. 108 , pp. 160-176
280 views DOI
2016
Response of the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Suspension Bridge under spatially varying multi-point earthquake excitations
Apaydin, N.
Vol. 84 , pp. 44-54
317 views DOI
2015
potential for wastewater management using energy crops
;Alistair R. McCRACKEN;Chris R. JOHNSTON
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 275-284
176 views Abstract
2015
approach on the existence of innovation in tourism
;Cristina BURGHELEA
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 75-80
180 views Abstract
2015
researches regarding morphologic features in some goat populations from the south of romania
;Horia PRISECEANU;Ion CĂLIN;Dana TĂPĂLOAGĂ;Ion RĂDUCUŢĂ;Paul TĂPĂLOAGĂ
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 405-410
35 views Abstract
2015
position and perspectives of development of the food processing sector in montenegro
;Miomir JOVANOVIĆ;Aleksandra DESPOTOVIĆ;Miljan JOKSIMOVIĆ
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 233-238
315 views Abstract
Journament Score
35.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,053 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

40.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.