Indexed in Journament

turkish online journal of educational technology

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
22.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,861 of 26,230 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 1.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name turkish online journal of educational technology
Abbreviated Name turkish online journal of educational technology
URL https://www.tojet.net

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 35.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 3.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 53.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.0
Accessibility 35.0 19.2
Timeliness 0.0 28.0
Diversity — 29.8
Innovation 3.0 34.2
Community Impact 2.9 18.9
Content Distribution 53.3 87.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2016
Fatih under project determination of scale development of teachers ’readiness levels: Sakarya national education directorate example
Çengel, M.
Vol. 2016 , pp. 1042-1056
398 views
2017
Ict integration in Turkey: Evaluation of english language E-content of the FATİH project
Kizilet, E.
Vol. 16 , pp. 33-41
344 views
2017
Teachers are determining the factors increasing the satisfaction of the Fatih project Sakarya example
Çengel, M.
Vol. 2017 , pp. 9-14
309 views
2016
Evaluation of fatih project in the frame of digital divide
Karabacak, K.
Vol. 15 , pp. 61-72
251 views
2017
The levels of english language (Efl) among students of public upper-secondary schools in Poland. The approaches towards assessments of different type of students—formative assessment and adjustment of education requirements
Krzyk, A.
Vol. 2017 , pp. 458-462
243 views
2016
Recontextualising curriculum and pedagogy of technical vocational education and training in South Africa
Ntshoe, I.
Vol. 2016 , pp. 321-330
227 views
2011
aislamiento e identificación de hongos nematófagos nativos de zonas arroceras de costa rica
;Walter Peraza-Padilla;Martha Orozco-Aveces;Alejandro Esquivel-Hern\u00E1ndez;German Rivera-Coto;Fabio Chaverri-Fonseca
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 233-243
226 views Abstract
2006
dinámicas campesinas y fitomejoramiento participativo: el caso de los sorgos blancos (sorghum bicolor, l. moench) en la región norte de nicaragua
;Gilles Trouche;Henri Hocd\u00E9;Silvio Aguirre-Acu\u00F1a;Felipe Mart\u00EDnez-S\u00E1nchez;Nury Guti\u00E9rrez-Palacios
, No. 3 , pp. 407-425
196 views Abstract
2017
English language teaching in Ecuador: An analysis of its evolution within the national curriculum of public primary schools
Soto, S.
Vol. 2017 , pp. 235-244
190 views
2017
Assessing the teaching and learning situations in secondary school Turkish language and literature and english curricula
Ocak, G.
Vol. 2017 , pp. 400-409
178 views
2019
evaluación ex-ante del impacto del genotipo de arroz l23 en la altillanura plana colombiana
;Diego Armando Marín-Salazar;Robert Santiago Andrade-López;Ricardo Antonio Labarta-Chaverri;Ángela Rocío Vásquez-Urriago;Samuel Caicedo Guerrero
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. -
152 views DOI Abstract
2017
Assessing the teaching and learning situations in secondary school Turkish language and literature and english curricula
Ocak, G.
Vol. 2017 , pp. 400-409
178 views
2017
The levels of english language (Efl) among students of public upper-secondary schools in Poland. The approaches towards assessments of different type of students—formative assessment and adjustment of education requirements
Krzyk, A.
Vol. 2017 , pp. 458-462
243 views
2017
English language teaching in Ecuador: An analysis of its evolution within the national curriculum of public primary schools
Soto, S.
Vol. 2017 , pp. 235-244
190 views
2017
Ict integration in Turkey: Evaluation of english language E-content of the FATİH project
Kizilet, E.
Vol. 16 , pp. 33-41
344 views
2017
Teachers are determining the factors increasing the satisfaction of the Fatih project Sakarya example
Çengel, M.
Vol. 2017 , pp. 9-14
309 views
2016
Research on the business related faculty members of Mehmet Akif Ersoy university about the basic problems of management education in Turkey
Özdaşli, K.
Vol. 2016 , pp. 369-374
158 views
2016
Recontextualising curriculum and pedagogy of technical vocational education and training in South Africa
Ntshoe, I.
Vol. 2016 , pp. 321-330
227 views
2016
Evidence-based mental-health promotion for university students - A way of preventing drop-out
Tarkó, K.
Vol. 2016 , pp. 261-267
178 views
2016
Development of scale of attitude about social studies class, citizenship, human rights, respect for diversity and tolerance issues for middle school students
Tekiroğlu, M.
Vol. 2016 , pp. 682-690
152 views
Journament Score
22.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,861 of 26,230 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

22.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

3.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

53.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.