Indexed in Journament

human reproduction update

ISSN 1460-2369· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,864 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 59.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name hum reprod update
Abbreviated Name hum reprod update
ISSN 1460-2369

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 70.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 16.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 70.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.2
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.1
Content Distribution 16.3 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2020
Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.
Hernández-Vargas, Purificación;Muñoz, Manuel;Domínguez, Francisco;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 264-301
452 views DOI Abstract
1970
Androgen excess fetal programming of female reproduction: a developmental aetiology for polycystic ovary syndrome?
Abbott DH;Barnett DK;Bruns CM;Dumesic DA;;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. -
390 views Abstract
2019
Potential roles for the kisspeptin/kisspeptin receptor system in implantation and placentation.
Hu, Kai-Lun;Chang, Hsun-Ming;Zhao, Hong-Cui;Yu, Yang;Li, Rong;Qiao, Jie;
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 326-343
387 views DOI Abstract
2005
Androgen excess fetal programming of female reproduction: a developmental aetiology for polycystic ovary syndrome?
Abbott, D.H.;Barnett, D.K.;Bruns, C.M.;Dumesic, D.A.;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 357-374
317 views Abstract
1970
Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?
Gardner DK;Lane M;;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. -
258 views Abstract
2010
Impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Moran, Lisa J.;Misso, Marie L.;Wild, Robert A.;Norman, Robert J.;
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 347-363
236 views Abstract
2021
Adipocyte and steroidogenic cell cross-talk in polycystic ovary syndrome
de Medeiros, Sebastião Freitas;Rodgers, Raymond Joseph;Norman, Robert John;
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 771-796
221 views Abstract
2001
Polycystic ovarian disease: heritability and heterogeneity
Crosignani, P. G.;Nicolosi, A. E.;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 3-7
171 views Abstract
2017
Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis
Hagai Levine, Niels Jørgensen, Anderson Joel Martino‐Andrade, Jaime Mendiola, Dan Weksler-Derri, Irina Mindlis, Rachel Pinotti, Shanna H. Swan
56 views DOI Abstract
2015
Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century
Marcia C. Inhorn, Pasquale Patrizio
47 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: epidemiological evidence, molecular insights, and clinical decision-making
20 views DOI
2026
Post-translational modification of proteins in the human testis development pathway
Firman P Idris, Lucas G. A. Ferreira, Brendan J. Houston, Sean J. Humphrey, Andrew Sinclair, Katie Ayers
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Assessing the reproductive lifespan of female cancer survivors using AMH: a meta-synthesis of longitudinal studies
Neerujah Balachandren, Stavroula Kastora, Richard A. Anderson, Clara Luehwink, Melanie Davies, Stuart Lavery, D. Mavrelos, Ephia Yasmin
33 views DOI Abstract
2026
Clinical outcomes of Day-7 blastocysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Julie Firmin, Bastien Ducreux, Haitam Saidessalam, Lucile Ferreux, Khaled Pocate-Cheriet, Ahmed Chargui, Chloé Maignien, Mathilde Bourdon, Pietro Santulli, Catherine Patrat, Patricia Fauque
26 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mapping ovarian cellular and molecular landscape across the lifespan of women: a scoping review
Darina Obukhova, Marina Loid, Marieke Schor, Han G. Brunner, Andres Salumets, Masoud Zamani Esteki
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
Sperm mitochondrial DNA copy number: a marker of male fertility and reproductive success
Savni Sawant, Jeffrey M. Mann, J Richard Pilsner
25 views DOI Abstract
2021
Adipocyte and steroidogenic cell cross-talk in polycystic ovary syndrome
de Medeiros, Sebastião Freitas;Rodgers, Raymond Joseph;Norman, Robert John;
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 771-796
221 views Abstract
2020
Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.
Hernández-Vargas, Purificación;Muñoz, Manuel;Domínguez, Francisco;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 264-301
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
Potential roles for the kisspeptin/kisspeptin receptor system in implantation and placentation.
Hu, Kai-Lun;Chang, Hsun-Ming;Zhao, Hong-Cui;Yu, Yang;Li, Rong;Qiao, Jie;
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 326-343
387 views DOI Abstract
2017
Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis
Hagai Levine, Niels Jørgensen, Anderson Joel Martino‐Andrade, Jaime Mendiola, Dan Weksler-Derri, Irina Mindlis, Rachel Pinotti, Shanna H. Swan
56 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,864 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

16.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.