the aging male : the official journal of the international society for the study of the aging male | Journament

Journal Ranking

#938 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

the aging male : the official journal of the international society for the study of the aging male

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim
Short Name aging male
Abbreviated Name aging male
ISSN 1473-0790
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/itam
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2019
Laparoscopic surgery for upper ureteral calculi in geriatric patients: 5 years experience.
Sahin, Aytac;Akan, Serkan;
, pp. 1-5
310 views DOI Abstract
2010
susceptibility of shallow landslide in fraser hill catchment, pahang malaysia
;Wan Nor Azmin Sulaiman
Vol. 3 , No. special issue , pp. 66-72
302 views Abstract
2019
Efficacy of combined treatment of intramuscular testosterone injection and testosterone ointment application for late-onset hypogonadism: an open-labeled, randomized, crossover study.
Narukawa, Tsukasa;Soh, Jintetsu;Kanemitsu, Noriyuki;Harikai, Shunji;Ukimura, Osamu;
, pp. 1-7
301 views DOI Abstract
2010
removal of heavy metals from textile wastewater using zeolite
;Normala Halimoon
Vol. 3 , No. special issue , pp. 124-130
264 views Abstract
2014
modeling the seasonal response of sediment yield to climate change in the laos-vietnam transnational upper ca river watershed
;Pham Quy Giang;Kosuke Toshiki;Masahiro Sakata;Shoichi Kunikane
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 152-162
256 views Abstract
2014
cost and benefit tradeoffs in using a shade tree for residential building energy saving
;Sappinandana Akamphon ;Kitti Akamphon
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 19-24
248 views Abstract
2015
coal mining vis-â-vis agriculture in india: a question of sustainability
;Sribas Goswami;Ramananda Goswami
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 24-33
244 views Abstract
2014
vulnerability index to climate change and its application for community-level risk assessment in thailand
;Atsamon Limsakul;Wimonratlee Katasaenee;Wutthichai Paengkaew;Asadorn Kammuang;Danai Tipmanee;Penjai Sompongchaiyakul
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 108-116
240 views Abstract
2013
health burden of extreme weather in thailand
;Jiraphan Plongmak;Nathsuda Pumijumnong;Kanitta Bundhamcharoen
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 6-12
226 views Abstract
2014
assessment of genotoxicity through issr marker in pistia stratiotes induced by lead
;Lamyai Neeratanaphan;Runglawan Sudmoon;Arunrat Chaveerach
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 99-107
208 views Abstract
View All 23 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.