Indexed in Journament

eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = joint diseases & related surgery

ISSN 1309-0313· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
19.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #29,027 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eklem hastalik cerrahisi
Abbreviated Name eklem hastalik cerrahisi
ISSN 1309-0313
URL http://www.tevak.org/?page=journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = joint diseases & related surgery
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.2
Innovation 18.0 30.1
Community Impact 2.1 11.5
Content Distribution 54.8 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2015
comparative cytomorphometric analysis of oral mucosal cells in normal, tobacco users, oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 253-260
436 views DOI Abstract
2013
cd 99 immunocytochemistry in solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas: a study on fine-needle aspiration cytology smears
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 151-155
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
The reliability of use of WhatsApp in type 1 and type 2 pediatric supracondylar fractures.
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 149-54
348 views DOI Abstract
2009
role of cytology in diagnosis of soft tissue sarcomas with special reference to false positive cases
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 15-19
312 views Abstract
2012
cytodiagnosis of multiple myeloma presenting as chest wall swellings
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 135-136
309 views DOI
2012
the utility of periodic acid schiff with diastase and alcian blue stains on fine needle aspirates of breast and salivary gland neoplasms
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 221-225
290 views DOI Abstract
2018
endoscopic ultrasound-guided cytodiagnosis of adrenal histoplasmosis with reversible cd4 t-lymphocytopenia and jejunal lymphangiectasia
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 110-113
249 views DOI
2015
fine needle aspiration cytology of non-hematological neoplasms in pediatric age group: our experience
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 165-169
241 views DOI Abstract
2015
"sea anemone-like ciliated tumor cells" in a case of serous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 268-269
231 views DOI
2019
The reliability of use of WhatsApp in type 1 and type 2 pediatric supracondylar fractures.
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 149-54
348 views DOI Abstract
2018
martian popping thing
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 53-54
15 views DOI
2018
toluidine blue with a synergistic effect in morphological assessment of oral cytosmears
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 8-14
140 views DOI Abstract
2018
chondromyxoid fibroma of the metatarsal bone: a diagnosis using fine needle aspiration biopsy
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 67-68
169 views DOI
2018
endoscopic ultrasound-guided cytodiagnosis of adrenal histoplasmosis with reversible cd4 t-lymphocytopenia and jejunal lymphangiectasia
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 110-113
249 views DOI
2017
cytological evaluation of thyroid lesions by nuclear morphology and nuclear morphometry
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 197-202
111 views DOI Abstract
2017
2016
fine needle aspiration cytology of chondroblastoma: a report of two cases with brief review of pitfalls
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 40-42
164 views DOI Abstract
2015
meningioma presenting as temporal region swelling: diagnosis by cytopathology and immunohistochemical confirmation on cell block preparation
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 204-206
226 views DOI Abstract
2015
comparative cytomorphometric analysis of oral mucosal cells in normal, tobacco users, oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 253-260
436 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
19.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #29,027 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

19.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

18.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

54.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.