eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = joint diseases & related surgery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3102 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = joint diseases & related surgery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name eklem hastalik cerrahisi
Abbreviated Name eklem hastalik cerrahisi
ISSN 1309-0313
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.tevak.org/?page=journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2015
comparative cytomorphometric analysis of oral mucosal cells in normal, tobacco users, oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma
;Mahadoon Nivia;Sukumaran Nair Sunil;Ravindran Rathy;Thapasimuthu Vijayamma Anilkumar
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 253-260
412 views DOI Abstract
2011
the clinical effectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with palpable breast lesions seen at the university college hospital, ibadan, nigeria: a 10-year retrospective study
;Cornelius O Ukah;Olayiwola A Oluwasola
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 111-113
399 views DOI Abstract
2013
cd 99 immunocytochemistry in solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas: a study on fine-needle aspiration cytology smears
;Ranajoy Ghosh;Saumya R Mallik;Sandeep R Mathur;Venkateswaran K Iyer
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 151-155
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
The reliability of use of WhatsApp in type 1 and type 2 pediatric supracondylar fractures.
Kapıcıoğlu, Mehmet;Erden, Tunay;Ağır, Muzaffer;Küçükdurmaz, Fatih;
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 149-54
321 views DOI Abstract
2012
cytodiagnosis of multiple myeloma presenting as chest wall swellings
;Madhusmita Jena
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 135-136
285 views DOI
2012
the utility of periodic acid schiff with diastase and alcian blue stains on fine needle aspirates of breast and salivary gland neoplasms
;N K Panicker;P H Jariwala;A C Buch;M Joshi
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 221-225
273 views DOI Abstract
2009
role of cytology in diagnosis of soft tissue sarcomas with special reference to false positive cases
;Sengupta Sanjay;Mondal Santosh;Mallick Mamata;Biswas Pranab;Basu Nandita
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 15-19
266 views Abstract
2018
endoscopic ultrasound-guided cytodiagnosis of adrenal histoplasmosis with reversible cd4 t-lymphocytopenia and jejunal lymphangiectasia
;Rakesh K Gupta;Kaushik Majumdar;Siddharth Srivastava;Shivakumar Varakanahalli;Ravindra K Saran
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 110-113
231 views DOI
2015
meningioma presenting as temporal region swelling: diagnosis by cytopathology and immunohistochemical confirmation on cell block preparation
;Anila Kunjulekshmi Amma Raveendran Nair;Nileena Nayak;Jayasree Kattoor
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 204-206
208 views DOI Abstract
2015
"sea anemone-like ciliated tumor cells" in a case of serous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary
;Uma Handa;Shilpa Goyal;Harsh Mohan
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 268-269
208 views DOI
View All 46 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.