Indexed in Journament

journal of orthopaedic surgery and research

ISSN 1749-799X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.4/100
Journament Score
#11,437
Journament Rank
26
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j orthop surg res
Abbreviated Name j orthop surg res
ISSN 1749-799X
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13018

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2019
A comparative study of the efficacy of ultrasonics and extracorporeal shock wave in the treatment of tennis elbow: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 248
444 views DOI Abstract
2020
Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate?
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 78
442 views DOI Abstract
2020
Research hotspots and trends of bone defects based on Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 463
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is it difficult to obtain inter-observer agreement in the measurement of the beta angle in ultrasound evaluation of the paediatric hip?
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 221
379 views DOI Abstract
2020
Matching actual treatment with patient administration-route-preference improves analgesic response among acute low back pain patients-a randomized prospective trial.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 85
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
The prototype BS-II for computer measurement of biomechanical characteristics of the human cadaverous lumbar spine.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 454
344 views DOI Abstract
2016
detection of adverse reaction to drugs in elderly patients through predictive modeling
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. 52-56
328 views DOI Abstract
2022
2020
Research hotspots and trends of bone defects based on Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 463
407 views DOI Abstract
2020
Matching actual treatment with patient administration-route-preference improves analgesic response among acute low back pain patients-a randomized prospective trial.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 85
366 views DOI Abstract
2020
Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate?
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 78
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes after open and closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
248 views DOI Abstract
2019
Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes after open and closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vol. 14 , pp. -
143 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
The prototype BS-II for computer measurement of biomechanical characteristics of the human cadaverous lumbar spine.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 454
344 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.