Indexed in Journament

abstract and applied analysis

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,694 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 63.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name abstract and applied analysis
Abbreviated Name abstract and applied analysis
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 59.3
Innovation 52.5
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 61.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for abstract and applied analysis
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 59.3 28.8
Innovation 52.5 31.2
Community Impact 10.7 13.4
Content Distribution 61.9 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2012
FDM for Elliptic Equations with Bitsadze-Samarskii-Dirichlet Conditions
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
386 views Abstract
2012
technical efficiency of sorghum production in hong local government area of adamawa state, nigeria
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 10-15
384 views Abstract
2019
Optimal Control against the Human Papillomavirus: Protection versus Eradication of the Infection
Vol. 2019
378 views DOI Abstract
2014
A Total Variation Model Based on the Strictly Convex Modification for Image Denoising
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
365 views Abstract
2019
Common Fixed Point Theorems for a Pair of Self-Mappings in Fuzzy Cone Metric Spaces
Vol. 2019
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inequality of Ostrowski Type for Mappings with Bounded Fourth Order Partial Derivatives
Vol. 2019
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
On the Resolution of an Inverse Problem by Shape Optimization Techniques
Vol. 2019
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimal Control against the Human Papillomavirus: Protection versus Eradication of the Infection
Vol. 2019
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Certain Subclasses of Bi-Close-to-Convex Functions Associated with Quasi-Subordination
Vol. 2019
226 views DOI Abstract
2019
Common Fixed Point Theorems for a Pair of Self-Mappings in Fuzzy Cone Metric Spaces
Vol. 2019
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
On the Resolution of an Inverse Problem by Shape Optimization Techniques
Vol. 2019
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inequality of Ostrowski Type for Mappings with Bounded Fourth Order Partial Derivatives
Vol. 2019
354 views DOI Abstract
2014
gender influence on the income of maize farmers in giwa local government area of kaduna state
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 14-18
136 views Abstract
Journament Score
37.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,694 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

59.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.