Indexed in Journament

Annals of botany

ISSN 1095-8290· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
48.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #255 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
236 Articles
Scores higher than 99.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Ann Bot
Abbreviated Name ann bot
ISSN 1095-8290

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 100.0
Diversity 60.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 18.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Annals of botany
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 60.0 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.6
Content Distribution 18.8 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (236)

2013
Matching roots to their environment.
Vol. 112 , No. 2 , pp. 207-22
506 views DOI Abstract
2019
Photosynthetic cyclic electron transport provides ATP for homeostasis during trap closure in Dionaea muscipula.
465 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparison of Zn accumulation and speciation in kernels of sweetcorn and maize differing in maturity.
Vol. 125 , No. 1 , pp. 185-193
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
Overexpression of PtHMGR enhances the drought and salt tolerance of poplar.
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring evolutionary theories of plant defence investment using field populations of the deadly carrot.
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
A pinch of salt: response of coastal grassland plants to simulated seawater inundation treatments.
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
In situ analyses of inorganic nutrient distribution in sweetcorn and maize kernels using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy.
Vol. 123 , No. 3 , pp. 543-556
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Slowly but surely: gradual diversification and phenotypic evolution in the hyper-diverse tree fern family Cyatheaceae.
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quantifying hydrologic controls on local- and landscape-scale indicators of coastal wetland loss.
358 views DOI Abstract
2026
Floral morphology tracks divergence time despite radical ecological shifts in southern South American mistletoes
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Divergent nitrogen-phosphorus allocation strategies across plant organs in Tibetan shrubs
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Same-sex neighbours grow better than opposite-sex neighbours across three plant species
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Diversification, evolutionary time, and climatic niche conservatism jointly explain global fern diversity
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Deceptive Aristolochia Trap-Flowers Pollinated by Male Phorid Flies Mimic Volatiles Specific to Female Phorids
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
The evolution of novel floral organs from an evo-devo perspective
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Cellular-level thallium distribution in Biscutella laevigata revealed by X-ray fluorescence microscopy-computed tomography
11 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
48.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #255 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

48.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

60.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

18.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.