annals of the university of oradea: fascicle of textiles, leatherwork | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1457 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

annals of the university of oradea: fascicle of textiles, leatherwork

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name annals of the university of oradea: fascicle of textiles, leatherwork
Abbreviated Name annals of the university of oradea: fascicle of textiles, leatherwork
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2015
INFLUENCE OF THE SHELL MATERIAL IN THE MICROCAPSULES FORMATION BY SPRAY DRYING
Marcela, FERRÁNDIZ ;Esther, FRANCO;Mónica, PASCUAL;Celia, DOLÇÀ;Lucía, CAPABLANCA;Ángeles, BONET Mª;Eva, BOU;
Vol. XVI , No. 2 , pp. 27-30
356 views Abstract
2013
beyond the current political economy of competencedevelopment
;Henning Salling Olesen
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 153-170
356 views DOI Abstract
2016
mind the gap! an exploration of the role of lifelong learning in promoting co-production and citizenship within social care for older people
;Trish Hafford-Letchfield;Marvin Formosa
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 237-254
326 views DOI Abstract
2014
NANOCOATING PROCESS FOR TEXTILES APPLICATIONS AND WOOD PROTECTION
, NICULESCU Claudia;, DUMITRESCU Iuliana;, GHITULEASA Carmen;, MOCIOIU Ana-Maria;, POPESCU Alina;, PITICESCU Roxana;, PETRICEANU Mirela;, BOGDANESCU Cristian;, SOBETKII Arcadie;
Vol. XV , No. 2 , pp. 69-74
325 views Abstract
2014
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ANTIBACTERIAL TREATED COTTON FABRICS AND EFFECT OF LAUNDRY CYCLE
Sema, PALAMUTCU;, KESKIN Reyhan;Mustafa, SENGUL;, DEVRENT Nalan;Yuksel, IKIZ;Baris, HASCELIK;
Vol. XV , No. 1 , pp. 79-82
321 views Abstract
2017
EFFECTS OF FATLIQURING PROCESS ON LEATHERS COLOURED WITH IR REFLECTIVE DYES AND PIGMENTS
Mete, MUTLU Mehmet;Nilay, ORK;Fatih, YAKUT;
Vol. XVIII , No. 2 , pp. 155-160
320 views Abstract
2016
ASPECTS OF THE INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ON THE TENSION PROPERTIES OF THE YARNS
Liliana, HRISTIAN;Lacramioara, BORDEIANU Demetra;Magdalena, OSTAFE Maria;
Vol. XVII , No. 2 , pp. 63-68
300 views Abstract
2019
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF RESIDUAL WATER FROM DIFFERENT SCOURING TREATMENTS OF HEMP/COTTON FABRIC
Mihaela, DOCHIA;Simona, GAVRILAȘ;
Vol. XX , No. 1 , pp. 41-46
285 views Abstract
2014
THE OPTIMIZATION OF PLUSH YARNS BULKING PROCESS
Adam, VINEREANU;Georgeta-Lidia, POTOP;Ana-Lacramioara, LEON;Elena, VINEREANU;
Vol. XV , No. 1 , pp. 121-126
267 views Abstract
2012
life history approaches to access and retention of nontraditional students in higher education: a cross-european approach
;John Field;Barbara Merrill;Linden West
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 77-89
255 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.