Indexed in Journament

BJPsych open

ISSN 2056-4724· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.6/100
Journament Score
#10,722
Journament Rank
16
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name BJPsych Open
Abbreviated Name bjpsych open
ISSN 2056-4724

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
Evaluation of capacity-building strategies for mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries for service users and caregivers, policymakers and planners, and researchers.
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. e67
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
Household economic costs associated with mental, neurological and substance use disorders: a cross-sectional survey in six low- and middle-income countries.
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. e34
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
Strengthening mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations from the Emerald programme.
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. e73
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mental health financing challenges, opportunities and strategies in low- and middle-income countries: findings from the Emerald project.
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. e68
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Scaling up integrated primary mental health in six low- and middle-income countries: obstacles, synergies and implications for systems reform.
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. e69
402 views DOI Abstract
2020
Generating value with mental health apps.
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e16
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Predicting high-cost care in a mental health setting.
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e10
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Carers' experiences of involuntary admission under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e19
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Risk factors for positive depression screening across a shipboard deployment cycle.
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. e84
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Advance decisions to refuse treatment and suicidal behaviour in emergency care: 'it's very much a step into the unknown'.
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. e50
330 views DOI Abstract
2024
Effect of strength-based physical exercise on telomere length as a marker of premature ageing in patients with schizophrenia: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. e162
94 views DOI Abstract
2023
National Prescribing Patterns of Psychotropic Medications in Older Adults in Oman
Vol. 9 , No. S , pp. S43-S43
60 views DOI
2020
Generating value with mental health apps.
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e16
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Carers' experiences of involuntary admission under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e19
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Behavioural profiling of autism connectivity abnormalities.
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e11
290 views DOI Abstract
2020
Predicting high-cost care in a mental health setting.
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e10
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Household economic costs associated with mental, neurological and substance use disorders: a cross-sectional survey in six low- and middle-income countries.
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. e34
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
Indirect costs of depression and other mental and behavioural disorders for Australia from 2015 to 2030.
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. e40
293 views DOI Abstract
2019
Risk factors for positive depression screening across a shipboard deployment cycle.
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. e84
337 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.